When you see something that is not right, not fair, find a way to get in the way and cause trouble. Congressman John Lewis
JUSTICE BUILDING BLOG
Sunday, December 13, 2009
NFL WEEK 14
Friday, December 11, 2009
RED TIDE
Marx herself presided over the Dunbar Village rape trial, which was far "scarier" than anything that's happened in Miami-Dade in a while. And where did that kid who got set on fire by his friends over a video game happen? Oh, Palm Beach County. And where did a high proportion of Madoff victims live? In Palm Beach. Miami may be at number 45 on CQ's press crime rankings, but West Palm Beach wasn't far behind at number 63.
What was the big crime story in Miami this year? The cat killer? Whatever.
The reason Miami and the rest of South Florida has crime is not because, "we live in paradise and everybody wants to live here -- including criminals." It's because we have a shamefully large population living in poverty (most of whom are minorities) that no one, especially the rich who can afford to live in luxury towers or gated communities, really gives a shit about.
Tuesday, December 08, 2009
MONKEY BUSINESS

NO MORE SOUNDINGS (for now)
THE HONORABLE SAMUEL J. SLOM
1351 N.W. 12 STREET ROOM 513
Miami, FL. 33125
Phone: (305) 548-5187
TO: ALL CONCERNED
FROM: SAM SLOM, ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE, COUNTY CRIMINAL DIV.
RE: SOUNDING CALENDAR ANNOUNCEMENT
DATE: DECEMBER 1, 2009
The Judges of the Criminal Division of County Court have decided that the only cases that will be set for sounding in the future are DUI cases. It is anticipated that the elimination of sounding calendars on non-DUI cases will begin in January. It is hopeful that the elimination of sounding calendars on non-DUI cases will result in the following benefits:
· Attorneys and defendants will not be required to attend those sounding calendars thereby saving them both time and money.
· Fewer people will be summoned to the courthouse on Wednesdays thus reducing the delay in gaining access to the building as well as to the courtroom.
· It is hopeful that fewer continuances will be sought thereby allowing cases to proceed to trial in a timely manner.
· Judges can utilize that two to three hour period, previously reserved for such soundings, to address motions, reports, or trials.
Naturally, as with any systems change, there will be the need to adjust how certain matters are handled. Examples of such are the following:
Continuances: Should a continuance be needed on a non-DUI case, the party seeking such should contact the judge’s judicial assistant to be placed on the motion calendar. Every attempt should be made to calendar the matter no later than ten days before the trial setting. Judges will grant expedited access to their motion calendar so that this time frame can be honored. Continuances sought on the day of trial will be subjected to strict scrutiny.
Discovery issues: In the event that a party needs to address a discovery issue, that matter should also be calendared no later than ten days prior to trial by contacting the judicial assistant. All parties are expected to exercise due diligence by seeking relief as soon as they should have realized that a discovery issue has arisen. Continuances sought on the day of trial for alleged discovery violations will be closely scrutinized.
The nolle prosequi of cases involving driver’s license issues: Many if not all judges will continue to utilize report calendars that enable defendants to produce a valid license with the hope of obtaining a dismissal of the charge by the Assistant State Attorney. Should defense counsel wish for their client to be placed on the report calendar it is recommended that they indicate such at the arraignment setting. Those not wishing to be placed on the report calendar will need to coordinate with the Assistant State Attorney in the relevant division if they wish to obtain a nolle prosse because of a valid license. The State Attorney’s Office has indicated that they are unlikely to nolle prosse at a trial setting if their witnesses have appeared so it is probably prudent for defense counsel to establish the existence of a valid license at least ten days prior to trial.
There are some additional changes that you will likely notice as we head into the new year:
· Judges will have the flexibility to set as many cases as they wish on their calendars and will no longer be constrained by the current setting cap imposed on such cases. It is hopeful that this will eliminate the need for a DWLS blitz in the future.
· Judges will be able to separate their calendar settings so as to set private lawyer cases, public defender cases and pro se cases at separate times and dates. This will reduce the time that lawyers, defendants and witnesses spend in court as they will only be summoned at a time when that particular type of case is set.
In that we tend to be creatures of habit, we are sometimes resistant to changes that alter the way that we handle matters. We develop a certain comfort level with the status quo and may experience anxiety when change enters the equation. That being said, sometimes change is not only necessary – it proves beneficial.
Naturally, as these new changes are implemented, we may need to tweak a thing or two so that these procedures truly enhance our court operations. If some component proves problematic we will work to remedy that. I will say that the judges are excited about these changes and are quite optimistic that they will prove to be beneficial to the administration of our justice system.
In closing, as we enter the holiday season, on behalf of the judges and their staffs, we hope that this season and the coming year will bring you and your families health, happiness and prosperity.
IMAGINE

Monday, December 07, 2009
BUTCHKO BLASTS SCRUGGS
More from Butchko:
Sunday, December 06, 2009
CHANGES
In Grateful Appreciation of the
Overwhelming Community Support of his Innocence
Invites the Community to his
APPRECIATION RECEPTION
On the Occasion of his Vindication
Sky lobby
Bank of America tower
100 S.E. 2nd Street
Miami, Florida 33131
Thursday, December 10, 2009
5:30 p.m. – 7:30 p.m.
RSVP to: RSVP@KUEHNELAW DOT COM.
NFL WEEK 13
Saturday, December 05, 2009
RICHARD ESSEN REMEMBERED
Thursday, December 03, 2009
FUN WITH EMAILS
From: Calli, Paul A. [mailto:
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 10:35 AM
To:
Cc: Descalzo, Marissel
Subject: RE: FACDL-Miami FW: Victoria Mendez for CABA President
Mikey - I suppose for the same reason we have to receive your almost daily unbelievably useless emails regarding your thriving traffic ticket practice, and your long rambling self congratulatory email about your trial.
Because youre on the list serv, and members may send around one email like this, as I recall.
Be a little more collegial big shot .
The Evil Empire and their executive board of the FACDL, desperate to hold on to their crumbling email empire struck next with this veiled threat against, among others, this humble blogger!!!
TO OUR MEMBERS:
The FACDL Miami Listserv is one of the most valuable tools that we offer
our members. It is a means for a wonderful exchange of ideas. (Rumpole edits part of the email and adds "Blah blah blah blah blah...")
While we appreciate that during these exchanges there will be disagreements
between lawyers, the Listserv should not be used in an unprofessional
manner. ...blah blah blah... . However, all members should remember to be courteous and civil to their fellow colleagues.
Additionally, The Executive Board of FACDL-Miami reminds you that
the Listserv is for the exclusive use of members only. The posts shall not
be disseminated to other organizations, government attorneys, Judges,
blogs, etc. (Rumpole says: BLOGS??? why not? Aren't we the front line of first amendment discourse? Why attack us just because a bunch of big shot lawyers can't keep their pens in their pockets? How much did those big shots bill for those emails attacking Catalano anyway, and who did they bill? Scott Rothstein??)
This should end any further discussion on the subject.
(or else!!!!)
The Executive Board of FACDL-Miami
Somewhere along the way as Catalano was dodging phaser shots someone wrote something about lawyers having to respond to stay on the FACDL Listserv at which point, lawyers, not wanting to miss any of the hijinks occurring between Catalano and Cali, immediately started sending "keep me in" emails. like this one:
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 3:03 PM
To: Roberto R. Pardo;
Subject: Re: FACDL-Miami The list
Thus if you're on the Listserv yesterday your in box was flooded with lawyers awakening from their post Thanksgiving slumber desperate to not be excluded from the spectators bleachers of this hoe-down hoot-n-nanny.
(Update: and we forgot- in the middle of it all was a light saber swipe at Catalano from a Listserv user named "Tom Thumb" which generated many emails pondering whether Tom Thumb was a mole infiltrating defense attorney strategizing.)
We felt compelled to publish at least some of the emails in deference to our Robed Readers, some of whom were able to view what was going on and emailed us to give our misbehaving legal brethren equal time with the Judges whose misbegotten emails were splayed across our pages much to everyone's delight.
So to summarize:
Paul Cali yelled at Mike Catalano.
Catalano responded and lawyers started choosing sides. Along the way someone said something about being removed from the Listserv after which a veritable email panic ensued with lawyers bombarding each other with emails desperate to be kept in the loop. The FACDL board took a shot at Rumpole just because they can, and we are thankful on this snowy Sierra Mountain day that we have something fun to blog about.
Wednesday, December 02, 2009
(Rump, with respect to the Essen family, I post these matters. If you want to hold them off until tomorrow, I certainly understand).
Justice Thomas, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court & The Death Penalty .......
In case you missed it, today marked a new low by Justice Thomas in his rein as an Associate Justice on our highest court. Here is what happened in case you were not awake at 1:34 am.
Tennessee executed Cecil Johnson at 1:34 a.m. today. Johnson had spent nearly 29 years on death row for three murders committed during a robbery of a Nashville convenience store. He was convicted in 1981.
The Supreme Court refused early this morning to hear the last-minute appeal of Johnson. The opinions written by Stevens & Thomas have been described now as a "Death Clash at the High Court". The issue was whether execution after lengthy delay is cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. A high court majority rejected Johnson's application for a stay of execution and his petition for review in which he raised the Eighth Amendment challenge.
Justice John Paul Stevens, joined by Justice Stephen Breyer, dissented, saying Johnson’s situation was “as compelling a case” as he had encountered raising the constitutional concerns that Stevens himself raised in a 1995 dissent from another denial of certiorari: Lackey v. Texas. Besides the constitutional issue, Stevens said Johnson’s case raised two important procedural questions: whether, as in Johnson’s case, the Eighth Amendment challenge can be made as a civil rights claim under Section 1983, and, if it cannot, whether a second habeas petition raising the claim is a successive petition subject to a procedural bar. Treating the claim as a habeas petition—which the lower court here did—only contributes to additional delay, he said.
Stevens said he remained “steadfast” in his view that execution after such delay is unacceptably cruel because it subjects death row inmates to decades of severe, dehumanizing conditions of confinement. Delaying an execution, he added, also does not further the public purposes of retribution and deterrence.
Thomas said Stevens first proposed his “novel” Eighth Amendment argument 14 years ago. Thomas stated, "There was no support for the argument then and there is no support now". Then Thomas goes all "Blackstone" on him, stating:
"There are alternatives to current procedural safeguards .... As Blackstone observed, the principle that punishment should follow the crime as early as possible was expressed in an English statute decreeing that “in case of murder, the judge shall in his sentence direct execution to be performed, on the next day but one after sentence passed.”
Thomas went further: "I have no doubt that such a system would avoid the diminishing justification problem Justice Stevens identifies ...."
Has anyone informed Thomas that, according to the Innocence Project, there have been no less than 245 post conviction DNA exonerations in the United States, 17 of which were people sentenced to DEATH.
============
CAPTAIN OUT .................
(I removed the portion of the post about the changes in County Court procedures because I like to stick to one major topic. I will post the now infamous Slom Memo soon. HR.)
3rd DCA ROUNDUP
Tuesday, December 01, 2009
IS TODAY THE DAY?
