THE CAPTAIN REPORTS:
In 2022, Governor Ron DeSantis stated:
“If a prosecutor wants to ‘reform’ the criminal justice system, then the appropriate thing to do is resign from office and run for the Legislature on such a platform.’’
Today, those words demand consistency.
CAPTAIN JUSTICE CALLS ON GOVERNOR DESANTIS TO REMOVE FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL JAMES UTHMEIER .....
On May 23, 2024, Jaylen Eubanks was arrested in Broward County and charged with Carrying a Concealed Firearm and Improper Exhibition of a Dangerous Weapon (Case No. 24-5748-CF-10-A). At the time of his arrest, Eubanks was 18 years old.
His counsel, Assistant Public Defender Thomas Cottone, filed a Motion to Dismiss the concealed firearm charge, arguing that Florida Statute 790.01(3) is unconstitutional. While Florida law permits concealed carry without a permit for individuals 21 and older as of July 1, 2023, it continues to prohibit concealed carry by those under 21.
Broward Circuit Court Judge Lorena Mastrarrigo denied the motion. Eubanks subsequently entered a no-contest plea, expressly reserving his right to appeal.
The case is now pending before the Fourth District Court of Appeal (Case No. 4D2025-1698). The Public Defender’s Office filed its Initial Brief. On February 6, 2026, under the direction of Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, Acting Solicitor General Jeffrey DeSousa filed the State’s Answer Brief.
In that filing, the State concedes that the conviction for carrying a concealed firearm should be reversed.
Attorney General Uthmeier has maintained that the State should not prosecute firearm cases involving 18-to-20-year-olds because, in his view, the statute is unconstitutional. In effect, the chief legal officer of Florida has chosen not to defend a duly enacted law of this State.
HAROLD PRYOR V. JAMES UTHMEIER: STEEL CAGE MATCH .....
In a highly unusual move, just three days later, the Broward State Attorney’s Office—led by Harold F. Pryor—filed a Motion for Leave to File an Amicus Brief.
State Attorney Pryor argues that prosecutors are constitutionally obligated to enforce the laws as written unless and until those laws are declared unconstitutional by the courts. To selectively decline enforcement based on personal constitutional interpretation, he contends, places an official above the law and neglects the duty of office.
In his Motion, Pryor emphasized:
“Statutes are presumed to be constitutional and must be construed whenever possible to effect a constitutional outcome."
On February 17, the 4th DCA GRANTED Pryor’s Motion to file an Amicus Brief.
DESANTIS’ HISTORY OF REMOVING ELECTED OFFICIALS FOR NEGLECT OF DUTY.....
The Florida Constitution authorizes the governor to suspend local government officials for:
“malfeasance, misfeasance, neglect of duty, drunkenness, incompetence, permanent inability to perform the member’s official duties, or commission of a felony."
In 2022, DeSantis removed Hillsborough County State Attorney Andrew Warren for "Neglect of Duty", after Warren pledged not to prosecute abortion-related cases. When the governor removed Warren from office, he accused Warren of "putting himself publicly above the law" by pledging not to enforce laws that criminalize abortion and prohibit gender-affirming care for minors.”
At the time, DeSantis stated: “If a prosecutor wants to ‘reform’ the criminal justice system, then the appropriate thing to do is resign from office and run for the Legislature on such a platform.’’
In 2023, DeSantis removed Ninth Circuit State Attorney Monique Worrell for Neglect of Duty, citing a pattern of policies that allegedly failed to hold criminals accountable. At the time of her removal, DeSantis stated: "Worrell’s practices and policies have too often allowed violent criminals to escape the full consequences of their criminal conduct."
A QUESTION OF CONSISTENCY
The issue now is straightforward:
If a state attorney’s refusal to enforce a law constitutes “neglect of duty,” what is the standard for the Attorney General of Florida?
If the Attorney General believes a statute is unconstitutional, the appropriate course is to seek legislative reform or await judicial invalidation — not to decline defense of the law based on personal constitutional interpretation.
Governor DeSantis has set the standard.
The question is whether he will apply it uniformly.
What was “putting oneself above the law” in 2022 cannot become “principled discretion” in 2026.
If the Governor intends to remain consistent with his stated principles, then the same measure he applied to others must now be considered here.
What is good for the goose is good for the gander.
Captain4Justice@gmail.com