May 24-28, 1940, London, were arguably the five most important days for Western Civilization. The decisions made by England's new Prime Minister- Winston Spencer Churchill -saved democracy and freedom from Nazi oppression. It is our intention to examine those days, at times hour by hour, drawing on a detailed history from multiple sources that we have spent a good deal of our life reading and studying. England from 1930-1945 is our passion, and the hours we have spent learning about the lives of those who lived in those times, and the decisions they made, has been our joy. So now that football is over, you can expect these posts on the weekends to come. Let's dive in.
May 24, 1940. Winston Churchill has been Prime Minister for exactly fourteen days. On this Friday things never looked bleaker for England. The decisions Churchill and his war cabinet would make would not win World War II, but they would prevent Hitler from winning the war, as Germany was never closer to winning the war than on Friday, May 24.
There are three prime characters we must study, and a fourth outside their orbit. You can think of this as a triangle of men, with one other hoovering outside the three interconnecting lines. Those men were Churchill, former Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, and Lord Edward Fredrick Lindley Wood Halifax, often referred to as the "Reverend Holy Fox" by Churchill behind Halifax's back.
What we first must understand is that Halifax was the King's choice to replace Chamberlain when he resigned. But Halifax was not a member of Parliament. He was a member of the House of Lords, and as such, he could not appear in Parliament and lead Parliament as a Prime Minister. When asked, Halifax deferred to Churchill being chosen, believing that he could be the power behind the throne. He was wrong. Churchill was always a step ahead of him. Or, as we will see, almost always.
The fourth member of this triangle plus one was...surprisingly, Benito Mussolini. It was not, as you might expect, Hitler, although his actions, and inactions were crucial to Churchill's and England's success.
The stage in Europe was bleak. France was nearly defeated. The Germans were marching on Paris. The British Expeditionary Force, over three hundred thousand men, were trapped and retreating to the French coast. England was facing the near total loss of her army. And there was more.
King Leopold III, the monarch of Belgium, was about to surrender his army and country to the Germans. When France and Belgium fell, England would truly be standing alone. Europe would be lost under the grip of the "odious Nazi' regime", and without her army, only the RAF and the navy would be left to protect England from invasion. The United States was eighteen months away from entering the war. President Roosevelt did not trust Churchill, and was hesitant to extend himself, especially while facing re-election for an unprecedented third term. Churchill and Roosevelt would not form their close friendship and trust for more than two years hence, and in the interim, Roosevelt plotted to take England's navy and many of her overseas bases because he and his advisors did not think England would survive.
Halifax moved steadily and stealthily, with the support of the King and a large contingent of the Conservative party, for a peace agreement with Hitler to be brokered by Mussolini, who had not yet brought Italy into the war. Some members of the Conservative Party (of whom Churchill was also a member) did not agree with seeking peace, nor did most of the Liberal Party, whose strong support was the only reason why Churchill was chosen as Prime Minister- making him a shaky, compromise PM.
For reasons we will discuss later, regarding some disastrous decisions Churchill made in the First World War, Churchill was not trusted. He was thought to be impetuous, stubborn to a fault; an unstable alcoholic who was not fit to lead England at this dark hour.
So we begin our study of these five days with Churchill being undermined by his own war cabinet, with shaky support at best from Parliament, facing the loss of France, Belgium, and England's army.
As we will see, Hitler was never closer to winning World War II than on Friday May 24, 1940. What Churchill and England did and did not do, and what Hitler did not do, shaped future events and sealed Germany's fate in a way that could not been seen nor understood during that fateful weekend. Had England fallen, the world would have been a much different place for the rest of the 20th century. And facing the loss of her army, England was about to fall.
But one man would not let that happen, and we will be examining in the days and weeks ahead on this blog his responses to the rapidly unfolding events during those five days in May, 1940, that would test him like no other leader has ever been tested.
The man was about to meet the moment.
5 comments:
The infamous "what if" version of history. Fun to play, especially while quaffing a few beers. The German navy, at its strongest, was never a match for the Royal Navy. The English Channel would have been awash in German blood. Churchill, to his credit understood this. Instead of focusing on Churchill's bravery and foresight, attention should be paid to the cowardice of the British politicians. They were ready to surrender. Another factor: the USSR, like the Germans, had been preparing for war with the Germans since 1930, thinking it was at lease a year away. It would have been hard for them not to pounce on Germany while they were battling England. Hitler had to be aware of this factor. Of course, we will never know and that is what makes the discussion so fascinating,
Release the binder!
The public is entitled to see the FACDL binder of complaints!
As I understand, Hitler failed to finish off the British Expeditionary Force at Dunkirk on May 24, 1940 due in part to the German connection with the British Royal Family. See, "The Halt at Dunkirk: Hitler’s Controversial Decision and the Fate of the British Expeditionary Force",
"On May 24, 1940, Hitler visited General Gerd von Rundstedt’s headquarters and abruptly ordered Guderian’s panzers to halt at the Aa Canal, just 15 miles from Dunkirk. The directive stated: "Leave Dunkirk to the Luftwaffe. If the capture of Calais proves difficult, it too may be left to the air force."" and the section, " Why Did Hitler Halt the Panzers?"
"1. Goering’s Promise: Luftwaffe chief Hermann Göring allegedly convinced Hitler that air power alone could annihilate the BEF, allowing the army to preserve tanks for the coming Battle of France."
"2. Political Calculation: Some, like Churchill, speculated Hitler hoped to negotiate peace with Britain and avoided humiliating them further."
https://ancientwarhistory.com/the-halt-at-dunkirk-hitlers-controversial-decision-and-the-fate-of-the-british-expeditionary-force/
From Wikipedia:
"In one of the most debated decisions of the war, the Germans halted their advance on Dunkirk. What became known as the "Halt Order" did not originate with Adolf Hitler. Generaloberst (Colonel-General) Gerd von Rundstedt and Generaloberst Günther von Kluge suggested that the German forces around the Dunkirk pocket should cease their advance on the port and consolidate to avoid an Allied breakout. Hitler sanctioned the order on 24 May with the support of the Oberkommando der Wehrmacht (German high command). The army was to halt for three days, which gave the Allies sufficient time to organise the Dunkirk evacuation and build a defensive line. While more than 330,000 Allied troops were rescued,[7] the British and French sustained heavy casualties and were forced to abandon nearly all their equipment; around 16,000 French and 1,000 British soldiers died during the evacuation. The British Expeditionary Force alone lost some 68,000 soldiers during the French campaign."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Dunkirk
The Duke and Duchess of Windsor visit Adolf Hitler in Germany in 1937
https://www.sbs.com.au/whats-on/article/a-brief-history-of-the-british-royals-and-their-alleged-nazi-connections/f0m6slhl3
"The Windsors – former monarch Edward VIII and his American love, Wallis Simpson, for whom he abdicated the throne – were a pesky thorn in the Royals’ side, not least because they were thought to be Nazi sympathisers. Intelligence given to the FBI claimed the Nazis were using the Duke and Duchess to glean information that would scuttle the war effort of the allies."
Also, "The Windsors’ Nazi-supporting German relatives also proved a fly in the ointment, although one, for a period, was a welcome visitor to Buckingham Palace. Former British prince Carl Eduard (Charles Edward), the Duke of Coburg, also known as "Charlie Coburg", was Queen Victoria’s grandson, first cousin to King George V and confidant to the Duke of Windsor. Coburg was employed by the Fuhrer as a go-between for the German government to exploit the Royal Family’s pro-German leanings."
"A pair of historians believe Edward VIII wasn’t the only son of King George V to conspire with the Nazis to create a WWII Anglo-German alliance. John Harris and Richard Wilbourn, authors of Rudolf Hess: Treachery and Deception, assert that Prince George, the Duke of Kent and uncle to Queen Elizabeth II, played a key part in planning a coup d’état with Hitler’s deputy, Hess, to remove Prime Minister Winston Churchill and forge a treaty with the Fuhrer."
"One of the most enduring mysteries of WWII is why Hess parachuted into Scotland in 1941. Harris and Wilbourn, after sifting through over 10,000 documents, believe the evidence "very strongly points" to an Anglo-German conspiracy. (Intriguingly Prince George, who served in the RAF, is said to have been in Scotland when Hess arrived.)"
Also see, "Why do we say the British Royal Family is German? Just how German are they?"
https://www.countryfile.com/people/royals/why-british-royal-family-is-german
and, "Is the Royal Family German? Their heritage explained"
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/is-the-royal-family-german-british-heritage-king-charles-b1071128.html
The Mountbatten family - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountbatten_family
Post a Comment