Time again for everyone's favourite blog post- Judge Hisch's Constitutional Calendar. Today he explores the history of Kush Patel's FBI-
(and we are looking hard at the over 49 on the MNF Bengals/Cowboys snoozer)
On July 26, 1908, Charles Joseph Bonaparte, who held the unique distinction of being both the Emperor Napoleon’s grandnephew and Teddy Roosevelt’s attorney general, complied with an instruction given by the latter. He hired nine agents away from the Secret Service, and 25 other detectives, and appointed them the first special agents of the Department of Justice’s newly-formed Bureau of Investigation. Congressmen and senators, who had not voted to fund this new agency, conjured up comparisons to the Okhrana, the czar’s much-feared secret police force; and made references to Joseph Fouche, the powerful chief of the secret police under Napoleon.
Not immediately, but during World War I and the “Red Scare” that followed it, many of these fears came to fruition. Those who were suspected of German sympathies, or communist velleities, or lack of enthusiasm for federal office-holders and their policies, were likely to find their homes or offices ransacked without warrant, their phones tapped without legal authority, their friends and family members shadowed or intimidated. These practices reached their apex during the attorney-generalship of Harry Daugherty, easily one of the greediest and most corrupt of public officials, who headed the Department of Justice during all of the Harding and some of the Coolidge administration.
When Daugherty became an unbearable political liability, Coolidge replaced him with the squeaky-clean Harlan Fiske Stone, giving Stone a mandate to clean up DOJ and especially its Bureau of Investigation. Stone set out to do so, issuing a series of press releases and interviews to make his intent clear. “There is always the possibility,” he went so far as to admit, “that a secret police may become a menace to free government and free institutions because it carries with it the possibility of abuses of power which are not always quickly apprehended or understood.” But in the end, “the enormous expansion of federal legislation, both civil and criminal, in recent years, has made a Bureau of Investigation a necessary instrument of law enforcement.” Stone knew that change would have to come from the top. He appointed, as acting director of the Bureau, a 29-year-old lawyer already serving in the Bureau. His name was J. Edgar Hoover.
In private correspondence with Harvard Prof. Felix Frankfurter (with whom Stone would later serve on the Supreme Court), Stone aired the view that Hoover should be kept on as director, and could be trusted to keep the agency from sinking to the nefarious “secret police” practices in which it had formerly engaged. Frankfurter wrote back, expressing some reservations. His correspondence seems to suggest that Hoover had been on good behavior because Stone was his boss, but that it was impossible to know how Hoover would behave under weaker, or less principled, attorneys general. “Hoover might be a very effective and zealous instrument for the realization of the ‘liberal ideas’ which you had in mind for the investigatorial activities of the Department of Justice when his chief is a man who cares about these ideas as deeply as you do, but his effectiveness might be of a weaker coefficient with a chief less profoundly concerned over these ‘ideas.’”
On December 10, 1924, Attorney General Stone informed Hoover that he was no longer merely “acting,” but was the director of the Bureau of Investigation (or, as it would become in 1935, the Federal Bureau of Investigation).
40 comments:
Thoughts about the Daniel Penny verdict?
https://www.youtube.com/live/tXJcwvI8DWQ?si=vrBOJ8u20zOxe9xk
Wow Khalil, say you were trained by MVZ without saying you were trained by MVZ. All these ASAs have the same ethics — ABSENT! Disgusting.
It was a ridiculous prosecution, a response to an irrational sense of entitlement and excuse and so glad he was acquitted
The Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson overturned Roe v. Wade finding that there is no express right of privacy under the U.S. constitution. However, as reflected in our Florida constitution, "Every natural person has the right to be let alone and free from governmental intrusion into the person's private life". In a dubious opinion, the Florida Supremes found that, in 1980, the general population did not contemplate abortion rights among the privacy rights of the Florida constitution, and therefore criminal actions forbidding medically terminated pregnancy is lawful. Just recently, a public majority declared that they wanted more liberal abortion rights. Discuss.
Seriously, I can't believe Danny Penny was ever prosecuted?
Letter by Senator Grassley of Iowa to FBI director, looks like a lot of payback coming in January.
You’re thinking of the wrong Khalil. Madani was the one friendly with MVZ.
No one cares about media hungry defense attorneys trying to cover up their own misconduct, Michele.
This blog is becoming a place of exposing one’s self (or one’s lack of self awareness and anonymous image) in the name of denigrating anyone and everyone at the Miami SAO without a second of praise for the blood and tears the great ASAs exhibit each day. I’m waiting to see this energy under Trump’s new DOJ -federally.
Can anyone give deets about the murder case recently dismissed for prosecutorial misconduct. Snitch testified and he was withheld from defense for 5 years? Maybe Adam Goodman’s case. Court supposedly wrote an embarrassing order for sao
Wait are we allowed to post names of people now? Blog censors weren’t allowing comments with names of people… or did that only apply to defense lawyers caught red handed?
This guy makes Rundle look amazing. This case as well as the Trump prosecution we’re disgraceful. https://www.yahoo.com/news/alvin-bragg-torched-online-failed-154803219.html
Is there a Shumie Pizza Party anytime soon?
Oh no Quinin in the fan club
Who is the media hungry defense attorney 👀
Except that Penny was acquitted and Trump was guilty as charged.
Media wouldn’t care if it weren’t for the SAO constant unethical actions…. So, you’re wrong, people do care
Good job outing yourself in the comments, Michele. Comment trolling on YouTube is a new low, though you’ve been doing that on IG for a while
I represented the “non-snitch”. What do you want to know?
But for Michele and Allison’s and other’s tenacity, most of this would have remained buried. Now, everyone is looking at everything with a critical eye. I don’t think Michele has to troll.
Judge, circumstances, etc. please.
Even if the abortion amendment passed, DeSanctimonious and his Legislators and the Florida Supremes would have ignored it and defanged it.
Can you share a copy of the order?
I don’t troll. That’s why my YouTube name is MICHELE BORCHEW and my IG is public. ❤️
It’s Horrible place to work as well I wish the media would do a special on the illegal working environment.
Please share
Federal prosecutors have charged prominent Miami real estate agents Tal and Oren Alexander, along with their brother Alon with rape among other things. First Diddy, Jay-Z......who is next?
And you are a moron
“the blood and tears the great ASAs exhibit each day”? Cmon, the once great State Attorneys office is a joke and embarrassment now, and denying that is a major part of the problem, not part of the solution … KFR and her senior staff need to go, replaced by ethical and honest folks. Period - everyone who is honest acknowledges this …
Most criticism about the SAO is toward Kathy and her chief assistants, although it’s too soon to know how this new iteration of Arrojo will turn out, as well as some rogue, unethical and/or incompetent, and not toward the pit ASAs most of whom are probably hardworking, ethical, etc. Change is needed in every institution. The lack of change inevitably leads to all sorts of problems, not the least of which being complacency, disconnect, apathy, unaccountability, and even corruption.
Institutionalization, especially at the top, also causes people to prioritize selfish motives (e.g., self-preservation, retirement, raw power, etc.) over the needs of the constituents. Every great leader knows this. Anyone who argues against it isn’t a great leader. This is why so many insist that Kathy and her generals need to go. They (at least most) aren’t bad people and no doubt they’ve done some great things during their leadership (some more than others), they’ve simply run their course. It happens everywhere. It isn’t personal. But they represent an entire community and must view their tenure and utility through those lenses.
The latest wave of scandals involving that office, combined with poor decision-making, topped with indolence, and sprinkled with epic resistance toward and failure to reform, is the best evidence that this group (Kathy included) needs to go. The longer they resist, the more credibility and respect they will continue to lose.
I understand the chief assistants wanting to hold on to their positions for as long as possible because for most this may be their last hurrah. I can also appreciate the desire to maximize public service retirement benefits. But the fact that they have collectively and repeatedly missed precious opportunities to make certain needed reforms has no correlation to these personal motivations and, therefore, the only conclusion that can be drawn from this failure of leadership is that they are out of touch with their obligations - both as attorneys and public servants. For these reasons, and for the sake of the residents of Miami-Dade County, I hope that this is their last term in that office.
Yes
She’s starting a four term, good luck
Agreed, however, Quinan, Abuhoff, Mitchell, and the like are not exempt. It’s not just the top tier.
What’s illegal about it? Call the herald, I’m sure they’d love to. They have been taking their duty to expose bullshit very serious lately.
Not to mention the EEOC violations.
“Institutionalization, especially at the top, also causes people to prioritize selfish motives (e.g., self-preservation, retirement, raw power, etc.) over the needs of the constituents. Every great leader knows this. Anyone who argues against it isn’t a great leader. This is why so many insist that Kathy and her generals need to go.”
How many SAO employees are at the point where they just can’t handle the pressure from the top?
Oh cry me a river.
Trolling? What is this a high-school blog?
It’s a hostile work environment and there is constant back biting and stepping on each other to prove one’s worth and. Value to Rundle. Sad
Post a Comment