JUSTICE BUILDING BLOG

WELCOME TO THE OFFICIAL RICHARD E GERSTEIN JUSTICE BUILDING BLOG. THIS BLOG IS DEDICATED TO JUSTICE BUILDING RUMOR, HUMOR, AND A DISCUSSION ABOUT AND BETWEEN THE JUDGES, LAWYERS AND THE DEDICATED SUPPORT STAFF, CLERKS, COURT REPORTERS, AND CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS WHO LABOR IN THE WORLD OF MIAMI'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE. POST YOUR COMMENTS, OR SEND RUMPOLE A PRIVATE EMAIL AT HOWARDROARK21@GMAIL.COM. Winner of the prestigious Cushing Left Anterior Descending Artery Award.

Tuesday, January 14, 2020

THE TARGETED KILLING OF ADMIRAL ISOROKU YAMAMOTO ......


THE CAPTAIN REPORTS:

(Please note that this post is NOT meant as a commentary on the actions by our government in the killing of Qasem Soleimani. Anyone who reads this Blog and knows it’s author is aware that we are sometimes treated to great history lessons about WW II. The history of WW II has always fascinated me as well. So, I wanted to share this Op Ed from the WP).

FROM THE WASHINGTON POST:

BEFORE SOLEIMANI, THERE WAS YAMAMOTO. BUT THE HISTORY IS VERY DIFFERENT.

By Ian W. Toll

Jan. 12, 2020 at 3:40 p.m. EST

Ian W. Toll is the author of a nonfiction trilogy about the Pacific War. The third and final book, "Twilight of the Gods: War in the Western Pacific, 1944-1945," will be published in July.

The U.S. military’s targeted killing of Iranian Quds Force commander Qasem Soleimani in Iraq on Jan. 3 may have been impetuous and destabilizing, as the president’s critics have charged, and it may yet bring ominous consequences in the region. But it was not unprecedented. A famous antecedent occurred during World War II, when U.S. forces targeted a senior Japanese admiral by shooting down his aircraft in the South Pacific. Lately the episode has been mentioned amid the debate over justifications of the Soleimani strike but without much historical context. Some background may be useful.

Adm. Isoroku Yamamoto, commander in chief of the Japanese Combined Fleet, was one of his nation’s most prominent military leaders. He had masterminded the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor and the attempted invasion of Midway, which ended in a disastrous naval defeat in June 1942. Earlier in his career, Yamamoto had studied English at Harvard and served as naval attache in the Japanese Embassy in Washington. Although Americans did not know it at the time, he had argued strongly against starting the war, warning that Japan could not match America’s industrial power.

In early 1943, after a ferocious six-month struggle over Guadalcanal in the Solomon Islands, the Japanese had pulled their last remaining forces out of the island, acknowledging defeat. In April, Yamamoto ordered a renewed aerial assault on Allied bases throughout the region. For its April 18 conclusion, the admiral planned to visit Japanese troops and air bases in Bougainville and the northern Solomon Islands. A detailed itinerary for his tour of inspection was radioed to Japanese commands throughout the region on April 13.

The signal, encoded in a Japanese naval cipher, was intercepted by several Allied radio listening stations. Within 18 hours, codebreakers in Pearl Harbor and Washington had decrypted and translated its key elements, including the specific information that Yamamoto would travel in a Mitsubishi G4M bomber escorted by six A6M Zero fighters and would arrive in Ballale, an island off southern Bougainville, at 0800 Tokyo time.

Edwin T. Layton, the Pacific Fleet intelligence officer, briefed Adm. Chester Nimitz on the morning of April 14. Studying the wall chart in his office, Nimitz saw that Ballale could be reached by American fighter planes based on Guadalcanal. According to Layton’s later account, Nimitz mulled over the pros and cons, considering both the ethical issues and the wisdom of assassinating Yamamoto.

Layton, who had been slightly acquainted with Yamamoto while serving in Tokyo before the war, argued that the Japanese admiral was the most revered military leader in Japan and that his death would strike a "tremendous blow" at the enemy’s morale. "You know, Admiral Nimitz, it would be just as if they shot you down," he said. "There isn’t anybody to replace you."

Nimitz did not take long to make up his mind. He ordered his South Pacific commander to attempt a fighter interception of Yamamoto’s plane, concluding: "Best of luck and good hunting." Certain early postwar accounts suggested that President Franklin D. Roosevelt authorized a "get Yamamoto" operation, but no evidence for this theory appears in the documentary record or in the recollections of those close to the president.

The job was assigned to the U.S. Army Air Force’s 339th Fighter Squadron, whose twin-engine Lockheed P-38 Lightnings were the only American fighters with the range for such a mission. As the crow flies, Ballale was 340 miles from the airfield on Guadalcanal, but the American fighters would have to take a circuitous route to evade radar detection.

The round-trip mission would require at least a thousand miles of flying, a distance that lay at the outer limit of the P-38’s range. Precise timing was critical, because they would not have extra fuel to burn while waiting for Yamamoto’s aircraft to arrive. Maj. John W. Mitchell, commander of the 339th, picked 18 P-38 pilots to fly the mission. Four were designated "killers," assigned to shoot down the G4M bomber carrying Yamamoto; the others would fly "top cover" against the escorting Zeros.

Taking off from Guadalcanal at 7:15 a.m., the P-38s flew over the sea at extremely low attitude, less than 30 feet above the wavetops. This allowed them to avoid the radar net and kept them under the visible horizon of Japanese-held islands along the route. The flight arrived at the interception point over southern Bougainville at 9:34. Almost immediately, the inbound Japanese airplanes were seen descending through a thin cumulus layer to the north. The P-38s climbed at maximum speed, throttles to the firewall. The escorting Zeros dived into the melee, but they were too late to break up the attack.

Lt. Rex T. Barber, flying one of the "killer" P-38s, banked sharply to the right and fell in behind Yamamoto’s plane. He fired into the target’s right engine and fuselage. The bomber began trailing flames, rolled over and descended toward the dark green canopy of the jungle hills below. It crashed, with a column of black smoke marking the point of impact.

Japanese search parties took more than a day to find the crash site. Yamamoto’s body was cremated, his ashes flown to Tokyo. Just as Layton had predicted, Yamamoto’s loss was a heavy blow to the morale of the Japanese people. The news was concealed from the public for more than a month. When it was finally announced on May 21, the radio announcer broke into tears, and a Tokyo diarist noted, "There is widespread sentiment of dark foreboding about the future course of the war." A grand state funeral for Yamamoto was held on June 5, with hundreds of thousands lining the funerary route from Hibiya Park to the Tama Cemetery.

Such public mourning may recall recent images from Iran after Soleimani’s death, just as Americans cheering the killing of Yamamoto, the man behind the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, may bring to mind the way they welcomed the death of Soleimani, a man with much innocent blood on his hands. But the context and circumstances of the Soleimani and Yamamoto killings are vastly different. Japan and the United States were in the midst of a savage, all-out war, and Yamamoto, as a combatant, was unquestionably a legitimate target; the United States and Iran are not formally at war — and there is much that we do not yet know about President Trump’s decision to order a drone strike on Soleimani. As for the longer-term consequences of the decision to "get Soleimani," we await the verdict of history.

CAPTAIN OUT .......
Captain4Justice@gmail.com

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

MAGA

Anonymous said...

The operative phrase being not "formerly"at war. As for being "informally" at war, the Iranians have shot at American warships, downed a U.S. drone, and stormed a U.S. embassy. All of the foregoing are acts of war. That makes the general an enemy combatant in uniform. Enemy combatants are fair game whenever and wherever found.

Anonymous said...

Matthew 26:52

Anonymous said...

@12:57 - You're a lawyer, presumably. And presumably you understand that words have meaning and formal process matters. To be "at war" or not is up to congress, not the president. See US Const, Art I, Sec. 8("The Congress shall have Power . . . (11)to declare war); see also 50 USC 1541-1548.

Maybe the POTUS had the legal authority to kill this particular Iranian (and maybe he didn't). But don't sit here and pretend that being "informally at war" is the same as being in a formal state of declared war - its not.

the trialmaster said...

I think Rumpole should go on jeopardy and challenge Ken.

Anonymous said...

Trump throws 10 stupidities a day in order to distract from the fact that he got buggered by the Chinese in the "tariff war".The North Koreans are treating him like a bitch too. He gave 23 billion of our money to big farm to make up for the soybean losses and got rolled in return. Boy do I feel great again.

Anonymous said...

Hey Boomer.

Anonymous said...

I'm disgusted when in Federal Bldgs and I have to see Ass Clown's pic staring down at me.

Anonymous said...

"I hate war as only a soldier who has lived it can, only as one who has seen its brutality, its futility, its stupidity."

Dwight D. Eisenhower