When you see something that is not right, not fair, find a way to get in the way and cause trouble. Congressman John Lewis
JUSTICE BUILDING BLOG
Monday, February 14, 2011
SILENT THOMAS
Sunday, February 13, 2011
FWS

This serious mental disorder afflicts millions of Americans every year, usually in the second week of February. Effective therapy is not available until the following August, at the earliest.
2. A crisis in the national spirit that is mitigated (only slightly) by the arrival of March Madness -- the NCAA basketball tournament.
3. The realization that life as we know it has ended, at least for six torturously long months.
4. Proof that Arena Football will never take the place of the real thing.
Thursday, February 10, 2011
MUBARK RESIGNS (sort of)...POLICE INVADE!

Tuesday, February 08, 2011
TRAFFICKING UNCONSTITUTIONAL! (but still not legal).
Monday, February 07, 2011
HAPPY BIRTHDAY RONALD WILSON REAGAN
Saturday, February 05, 2011
FIRST SUPER BOWL PREDICTION
Friday, February 04, 2011
INVESTITURE OF SAMANTHA RUIZ COHEN
Wednesday, February 02, 2011
EVENT CALENDAR
"The issue before this Court is whether it is per se reversible error when a judge erroneously instructs a jury prior to deliberations that it cannot have
any testimony read back. We hold that the error, if preserved, is per se reversible because it is impossible to determine the effect of the erroneous instruction on the jury without engaging in speculation, and thus a reviewing court is unable to conduct a harmless error analysis."
Rumpole says: First, kudos to Mr. Trevilla if he was the trial attorney, for being on the ball and objecting and preserving the error. This has bugged us for a long time and we have laboured long and hard to spread the word that judges CANNOT tell jurors that they cannot have testimony read back or typed up and that it is per se reversible error to tell a jury that so long as the defense objects and preserves the error. Great job to Mr. Kalter for hitting one out of the park and great job to the trial lawyer for doing their job and preserving the error.
When in doubt- OBJECT!
PS: Julio: 30 freaking years for fleeing? Really? 30 years? 15 wouldn't have been enough? 30 years (360-life) is the highest level under the federal guidelines, reserved for the most serious of cases. You've been around from the time when a second degree murder in Florida under the old guidelines was 12-17. And now you're handing out out three decades for a fleeing?
Tuesday, February 01, 2011
GREAT EVENTS
Later this month there will be a civil rights panel discussion and reception on February 23 from 4-6 pm in the jury room (5th floor), moderated by Professor Charles Ogletree
You can RSVP at 305-523-590
Monday, January 31, 2011
SILENCE OF THE JEDI
Sorry to change the subject. But latest talking points by Gov Scott and Legislators is that they are going to balence the defecic on our backs. Soon the ASAs n APDs n AAGs, who havent seen a raise nor COLA in 6 years get to pay their own pention contribution. Instead of HALF what a private attorney can earn will will mAKE A third. THE Make-up/BALENCE WAS OUR BENI'S BUT NOW WE ARE SEEN as PARASITES ON THE STATE BUDGET. THEY have
NO RESPECT for STATE WORKERS or the FACT WE MAKE THE STATE GOV'T RUN. Thanx for your service, NOW BEND OVER!!
The Return of the Jedi....and Almendarez-Torres:
Federal practitioners have long celebrated the Apprendi line of cases, while criticizing the decision in Almendarez-Torres which excepted recidivism (prior record for our robed readers) from the requirement that a prior record enhancement be proven to a jury like other enhancements.
The decision, which was 5-4 to begin with, has been subjected to an unending line of criticism from those like Justice Thomas who said he "succumbed to error" in casting the 5th vote, and from the majority in Apprendi who opined that “it is arguable that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided.”
Shots continued to be fired at Almendarez-Torres as per the SCOTUS blog:
"the Court called for a response with respect to two petitions that ask the Court to reconsider Almendarez-Torres: Ayala-Segoviano v. United States, 10-5296, and Vazquez v. United States, 10-6117. Since the government filed briefs in opposition, the Court has relisted those cases three times, at the January 7, 14, and (apparently) 21 Conferences."
Stay tuned to see if the Empire Strikes Back.
Friday, January 28, 2011
CHAOS IN EGYPT
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
BLUE FOR THE BLUE BOOK
RULE 3.180. PRESENCE OF DEFENDANT
(a) Presence of Defendant. In all prosecutions for crime the defendant shall be present:
(3) at any pretrial conference, unless waived by the defendant in writing;
We were pleased to learn that when the attorney cited the rule to the unknown Dade Judge he/she followed it. Fat chance of that happening the other way around when an out of county attorney contravenes the conventional way the court does things. Can you say warrant, bond revocation and Florid Bar complaint?
And habit is really what this is about. We have a way of doing things in Dade that includes the Defendant showing up for felony pre-trial hearings purely out of habit. But the rule doesn't require it.
So what say you Robed Readers of Dade? Can we all starting getting waivers and moving things along in court and saving tens of thousands gallons of gas and work hours and excuse clients from pre-trial hearings that takes hours of out their days and minutes in actual court time?
Go green, be clean, follow the rules. See you in court (sans client??? We shall see.)