JUSTICE BUILDING BLOG

WELCOME TO THE OFFICIAL RICHARD E GERSTEIN JUSTICE BUILDING BLOG. THIS BLOG IS DEDICATED TO JUSTICE BUILDING RUMOR, HUMOR, AND A DISCUSSION ABOUT AND BETWEEN THE JUDGES, LAWYERS AND THE DEDICATED SUPPORT STAFF, CLERKS, COURT REPORTERS, AND CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS WHO LABOR IN THE WORLD OF MIAMI'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE. POST YOUR COMMENTS, OR SEND RUMPOLE A PRIVATE EMAIL AT HOWARDROARK21@GMAIL.COM. Winner of the prestigious Cushing Left Anterior Descending Artery Award.

Wednesday, March 01, 2006

ENOUGH

We surrender today. 41 posts. Arguments raging back and forth. Cites to the Judicial Code Of Conduct. Mostly good stuff, but we feel a bit overwhelmed. Gratified to have readers, but overwhelmed nonetheless.

However, this witty post made our day and deserves front page status:

Anonymous wrote:

When I read that D'Arce said he was targeted on Suspicion of Being Rumpole (SOBR), I nearly dropped my danish I was laughing so hard. But Rory was nearby, so I thought better of it.

Rumpole replies, observe the anatomy of a clever post: 1) It creates a new acronym SOBR, which is relevant and is hereby adopted (although we loathe the subject); 2) it references a continuing joke from our earliest days when no one was reading us. Great post, take a bow.


To the reader thoughtful enough to post the Miami “no credit” Herald article written by a woman who has been banned from the blog- since we banned her, we will not reprint her trite tripe. We are not referring to our favorite Herald scribe Oh Susannah, but that writer of tepid talk of the town.

D’Arce is done. He has been examined more thoroughly than Dick Cheney’s shotgun. Hopefully, tomorrow brings new topics.


See You In Court.

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

Sung to the tune of Cole Porter’s De-lovely.


The election is near, and the skies are clear
And if you want to be a judge dear
It's delightful, it's delicious, it's D’Arces.


I understand the reason why
You're running for judge,
well so am I
It's delightful, it's delicious, it's D’Arces

So please be sweet, my chickadee
And when I bill ya mucho bucks, say to me
"It's delightful, it's delicious, it's delectable, it's delirious,
It's dilemma, it's de limit, it's deluxe, it's D’Arces.

Anonymous said...

Sung to the theme from COPS

(Picture a drunk shirtless guy outside a trailer with some ugly girl yelling with a beer and cigarette in her hand)

Bad boy bad boy, whatcha gonna do?

Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?

Anonymous said...

Is this another act of censorship. What is wrong with you, Rump? What is your agenda? Who are your masters?

Anonymous said...

rump you told us that you were a former prosecutor. you told us that back in december. you really are old arent you?

Anonymous said...

What about the news that Lynn Overmann got a City of Miami cop arrested for perjury? Check out the Miami Herald Local section today 3/2/08.

Anonymous said...

mrs. overmann is a good girl and a good lawyer. but you already are aware or you wouldnt have hired her.

Anonymous said...

"The difference between the right word and the almost right word is the difference between lightning and a lightning bug."
-Mark Twain

Anonymous said...

Hey , Who read puddi'nhead Wilson?

Rumpole said...

What censorship??? We have no agenda, and our only master is She Who Must Be Obeyed.

Anonymous said...

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

Anonymous said...

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Anonymous said...

[deleted]

Anonymous said...

Z - I have a question for you:

Y?

Anonymous said...

Here is the most interesting part of the case you posted.

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico.
Angel Luis García, Carmen García et al., Plaintiffs and respondents
v.
World Wide Entertainment Co., Darrin McGillis, Defendants and petitioners
No. CE-92-126
San Juan, Puerto Rico, December 24, 1992


"The plaintiffs alleged that both contracts were void because they were contrary to law, morals and public policy. As second cause of action, plaintiffs alleged that defendants (McGillis and boyfriend) had physically abused and sexually harassed the minor, for which they sought damages."