WELCOME TO THE OFFICIAL RICHARD E GERSTEIN JUSTICE BUILDING BLOG. THIS BLOG IS DEDICATED TO JUSTICE BUILDING RUMOR, HUMOR, AND A DISCUSSION ABOUT AND BETWEEN THE JUDGES, LAWYERS AND THE DEDICATED SUPPORT STAFF, CLERKS, COURT REPORTERS, AND CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS WHO LABOR IN THE WORLD OF MIAMI'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE. THIS BLOG HAS BEEN CALLED "THE DEFINITIVE BLOG ON MIAMI CRIMINAL LAW" BY THE NY TIMES, THE WASHINGTON POST, THE POPE, AND DONALD TRUMP WHO ALSO ONCE SAID IT WAS "REALLY GREAT". POST YOUR COMMENTS, OR SEND RUMPOLE A PRIVATE EMAIL AT HOWARDROARK21@GMAIL.COM

Monday, March 13, 2006

LOCKEM UP SAM SLOM WRITES A BILL???

HB 409 - Driving Under the Influence

GENERAL BILL by Rep. Planas
Driving Under the Influence: Requires that a defendant charged with driving under the influence be held in custody until a first appearance hearing; requires specified investigation prior to and presentation of findings at such a hearing; specifies factors to be considered in determining whether to grant pretrial release; prohibits release of a defendant after a first appearance hearing until specified conditions are met.
Effective Date: July 1, 2006.

Last Event: Withdrawn prior to introduction on Thursday, January 05, 2006 1:39 PM


Representative JC Planas proposed the above bill to the Florida Legislature (The Tallahassee Lassies, or lap-dogs, which ever you prefer.)

Get the full text here of Plana’s pandering for MADD votes, by searching “bills” and then “Planas”.
http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/

What you won’t find while searching for the full text of the bill are the hands behind this MADD bill. Not surprisingly you will find the Dade State Attorneys Office, and their County Court Chief.

Surprisingly however (although many say they are not surprised) , people are making serious allegations that you will also find the hands of Chief County Court Criminal Divison Judge Sam “lock em up” Slom.

If and only if this allegation is true: and that is a big IF (we are giving the Judge the benefit of the doubt here) then....


What in the name of John Ashscroft is a sitting Judge doing conspiring, combining and confederating with The State Attorneys Office to get a bill passed that will make it more difficult for people arrested for DUI to bond out?

If Judge Slom did not help write the bill and work with the State to get it introduced, then he has nothing to answer for. However, if he did help the State lobby for the bill, then we think he has a lot to answer for.


Lets play pretend: Pretend the bill passed, and we will fast forward to a Saturday bond hearing sometime next year.

A young woman and her 7 year old son sit with their attorney in the bond hearing courtroom on the 5th Floor. Her husband was arrested Thursday night by Officer Closius after he left his second job as a bartender. Closius wrote in the report that he noticed the strong odor of alcoholic beverages on the Defendant. Closius ignored the Defendant’s explanation that he weaved a little because he works two jobs and only sleeps 5 hours night.

The woman is worried because the man was fired from his Janitors job for not showing up for work Friday, and she is not sure how she is going to pay the attorney, post bond, and make rent next month.

The bailiff walks in and says “all rise” and in strolls Judge Slom.

The attorney frowns.
The woman whispers :”do you know this Judge?”
The attorney sadly nods. “Yes, he was the person who along the prosecutor’s office wrote the new DUI law that prevented your Husband from being released from Jail yesterday.”

Astonished, the woman asks, her voice rising above a whisper: “How is he going to be fair? He’s the one who wrote the law making it more difficult for people like my husband to bond out?”


”I’m afraid so" says the attorney. "And MADD gave him an award a few months ago to boot.”

Florida Judicial Cannons of Ethics:

CANNON 2: A Judge Shall Avoid Impropriety, and the Appearance of Impropriety
in all of the Judge's Activities.


Lets look at this another way. Governor Bush falls off his dirt bike while riding with his brother and hits his head. In a daze, he appoints Richard Hersch to the County Court. (For this scenario, the cheap shot is against the Governor. He would never appoint anyone so qualified and reasonable and experienced. We know Mr. Hersch would make a great judge.)

And lets say, Judge Hersch, following Judge Slom’s example, meets with Bennett Brummer and the President of the FACDL and they draft legislation amending the DUI law to remove the presumption of impairment for people driving with a Blood Alcohol level above a .08.

“Presumptions against criminal defendants are unconstitutional” writes Judge Hersch. Hersch and company find a sympathetic legislator, and the bill is submitted.

The following Monday the State Attorneys Office storms to Judge Slom, who happens to be having coffee in their office anyway, and demands Judge Hersch be removed from the criminal bench.

“How can we have confidence that the State will get a fair trial before Judge Hersch when he is lobbying against the laws we enforce?” they whine.

The point is that Judges can engage in activity "to improve the law, the legal system and the administration of justice." So says Cannon 4 of the Cannon’s of Judicial Ethics.

But Cannon 2 requires the Judge to avoid even the appearance of impropriety.

IF- and this is a BIG IF: Judge Lock em up Slom worked with the prosecution to write and/or promote the new proposed bill, then his activities give the appearance of bias against people arrested for DUI. We would be hard pressed to find any way Judge Slom could continue to sit in criminal court while working for enactment of stricter DUI laws. In fact, just working with the State Attorneys Office (or the PD's Office) on any proposed bill would give any Judge the appearance of impropriety.

Some may say that there is a flaw in the system that allows certain Defendants to bond out prior to a court hearing. That is not a Judge's concern. A Judge's job is to apply the law as written.

Isn't this what conservatives whine about all the time? Activist Judges? Don't the conservatives sing and dance that it is up to citizens to work with the legislature to enact new laws, and for Judges to merely interpret those laws? Or is it OK for a Judge to be an activist as long as s/he is an activist for the "right" (right wing) causes?


We think that there may be another more sinister side to this.

If Judge Slom has created an appearance of impropriety regarding DUI bonds, then he should never sit on a bond hearing calendar again.

Ever.

And what an ingenious way for a Judge to avoid that Sunday New Years Day Bond Duty!!!! Judge Slom may just be a genius!!! (At least we give credit where it is due.)

Seriously, it would be nice if Judge Slom could respond to this. This blog has published this post based on reports from several disgruntled attorneys. So at the very least, Judge Slom should know he is the subject of a troubling allegation.

We are not sure what, if anything Judge Slom actually did. But other attorneys think Judge Slom has been actively working for a new strict DUI law.

We are willing to give Judge Slom the benefit of presuming him innocent of any wrongdoing until it is proven otherwise.

Which is more than a person arrested for DUI would get under the proposed legislation.

See You In Court.




26 comments:

Jason Grey said...

Nobody should be able to bond out on any offense without going before a magistrate. Probation holds are often missed, people out on bond slip through the cracks,and people with horrible records post bonds inconsistent with their level of danger to the community.
On the flip side people often pay large fees to bondsmen on bullshit cases that Fast Gerry would send to pre- trial, find no PC, or ROR. Is it worth sitting a few extra hours to save thousands of dollars? Furthermore it would help cut down on the "bondsmen" who hustle clients to attorneys for a fee.
New york city has 24 hour "arraignment" court and it works great. Sadly, dade county will never be willing to spend the Money.

Sam I Am said...

If Blockführerin Closius says he was drunk, he was drunk.

Anonymous said...

Wasn't Representative Planas Brian Tannenbaum's partner? What the hell is he doing then? Didn't he learn anything Brian? Its bad enough that DUI offenders are required, under the law, to remain in jail at least 8 (which usually turns into 20) hours after arrest. Brian, I suggest you have a sitdown with your ex-partner, as he has been behind several very sketchy proposals as of late.

Anonymous said...

yes they were partners.

Anonymous said...

Planes is and will always be a clown.

Anonymous said...

MAybe Tannenbaum saw this coming and ditched Planas

Anonymous said...

J.C. Planas is Judicial Candidate Victoria del Pino's husband

Anonymous said...

No - the former Victoria del Pino-Planas now del Pino is J.C. Planas' ex

Anonymous said...

Slom you need to respond. A lot of defense atty's read this blog.

Anonymous said...

closius and his fat buddy davenport are lying piggies! oink!!! oink!!!

Anonymous said...

lol! yeah, those fuckers would testify that mother teresa had horizontal gaze nystagmus for a lap dance and a couple of donuts!

Anonymous said...

Grey has a point, but with the advent of technology, they should be able to run a guy instantly.

Anonymous said...

Standard bond blows dog chunks, the ones who have the worst records, usually post it before 24 hours. Hey at least Fast Gerry isn't credit time serving the DUI defendants, that has to be a plus.

If a judge is behind drafting legislation, then I would think that would fall under Florida Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 3E(1)(c), requires that: "A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge's impartiality might reasonably be questioned..." Florida Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 2, states in relevant part that: "A judge shall avoid impropriety in all of the judge's activities." If a judge is not impartial because they favor the zealous prosecution of DUI, that does sound like grounds for recusal.

But then again, there are a number of defense oriented judges in that courthouse who make their opinions known, particularly one who likes to do off the record sidebars.

There are few county court judges who are saints in the respect, that they have not tipped their hands as being more towards one side over the other.

Anonymous said...

Bondsmen are crooks and taking money from them is always a plus. Especially since I am not paying them the going rate of 1/3 of the retainer for cases, I am getting no business because of this.

broke and private

Anonymous said...

Slom is a fucking joke if this shit is true. When is he up for re-election? Slom, do you want Hisp. opposition? B/C I can make that happen. You better respond to these allegations.

Anonymous said...

Slom is a good judge, open your eyes, when you see what are the options available.

Anonymous said...

This good judge/bad judge crap is just that crap.

Prosecutors define good judges as those who take everyone in no bond on a dirty urine PVH, sentence people harshly, deny every defense motion, and let in every piece of crappy evidence at trial.

Defense attorneys define good judges as those that occasionally give a bond on a PVH, don't believe that the state's offer pre-trial governs what the sentence is post trial for the "nerve" of going to trial, and actually listen with respect to arguments, before sentencing people harshly, denying every defense motion, and letting in every piece of crappy evidence at trial.

Can we move on now?

Anonymous said...

You whine too much.

Anonymous said...

What a whiny comment above. Defense attorneys define good Judges as ones who let defense attorneys continue every case because of the usual bogus excuses:1)I need to file a motion to suppress even if they could have filed the usual boilerplate that they always file 2) I cant go to trial today because I have a twenty minute plea in Federal court at 10am(eventhough the trial wont start untill 1pm)3)I need a continuance to depose the guy listed on the property reciept. 4) I havent gotten the depo transcript eventhough I took the depo nine months ago. Defense attorneys also think that boot camp is a constitutional right for someone under 21 charged with an armed robbery no matter how brutal. They also consider it a constitutional right to have the Judge to offer a non-minman career criminal the bottom of his guidelines.
The real mark of a good Judge to a defense attorney is one who will allow them to withdraw when the guy wont plead after the attorney lowballed the case for $9,999 dollars in cash.

Anonymous said...

LOL. Too funny. The State has been complaining that Judge Slom is too soft for years. The defense bar's been claiming the opposite. Sounds like he's doing what he should to me.

The truth is that Judge Slom is one of the brightest and thoughtful judges on the bench. I disagreed with him often, but he could always defend his position unlike many of the others (some of whom I regularly agreed with).

Anonymous said...

Jason Grey is dead on with the first comment.

Anonymous said...

Jason Grey wants Miami to be more like NYC with respect to initial appearance hearings? You must not have actually practiced in NYC. Trust me, our system, though imperfect, is ALOT more efficient, and better protects the defendant's rights and community safety than does NYC's.

Anonymous said...

agree. i worked there. and lobster court. done it. i prefer the klien bros.

Anonymous said...

Nyc justice over Miami? Sometimes it seems like Jason grey just makes dumb shit up just to have something to say. Have you ever practiced in NYC? Absolutely ridiculous.

Anonymous said...

"Our system better protects the community than New Yorks?" You must be kidding.

Anonymous said...

No. Not kidding. Long-time rez of NYC and for over a decade now, Miami. Again, not kidding.