Thursday, August 24, 2006

PARTY

The comments under the previous post are pure gold. Go read those comments. Most are very funny.

BLOG PARTY?



Someone wanted to throw a blog party next Thursday night August 31-right before the start of the long weekend.


A few people mentioned Tobacco Road. We have drunk our share of Chateau Miami River at the Road, and our bar tab is such that we are still welcomed.

Come one. Come all-even our dear robed readers.

Maybe, just maybe, Rumpole will buy you a drink.

We're the one in the Rumpole mask.


Ms. Nesmith has already promised an appearance.

HR.

72 comments:

  1. isn't it obvious; we should be at Tobacco Road from 5:00 - 8:00 PM.; Thursday, August 31, 2006.

    Be There or Be Square

    ReplyDelete
  2. And all the candidates should go to the Blog party.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow! A party gathering of a bunch of anonymous lawyers who bash named persons with allegations which are unprofessional, sometimes slanderous, sometimes alleging criminality. All anonymous of course. Almost never supported by evidence. The most recent onslaught against Scott Saul alleging an improper relationship with a bail bondsman and criticizing his clothes. Well when you work for yourself you can wear what you want. Maybe he is a little depressed representing the scum of the earth for 10 years handling cases most of his critics have no experience in handling. That is why they have to criticize anonymously. They criticize people who have more success, experience, standing in the community. There are maybe 5 attorneys in this county who outshine the rest of us and the rest of us have no business criticizing each other anonymously, alleging criminality, ethical violations, slander etc. Need you be reminded that we have a code of professional conduct and ethical rules to follow. Are we a profession which defends the poor, upholds the constitution, prosecutes the guilty etc. or are we becoming indistinguishable from the Tabloid at the supermarket which covers the private life of actors. I know my comments will not affect this blog so I will offer this gratuitous advice: all you people slandering Scott Saul collectively probably on a good day could last one round with him and you know it and that is another reason why you are anonymous but it is not hard to figure out who many of the people running this blog are - most of whom are hero worshippers of a certain outstanding lawyer in the twilight of his career. I wonder how long before this is removed from your blog.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hero worshipper? Certain lawyer in twilight of career?
    Mishkin?

    ReplyDelete
  5. TOPIC FOR THE DAY

    WHAT YOU WILL NOT HEAR AT THE BLOG PARTY:

    EXAMPLE: Steve Leifman to Juan D'Arce: "Best of luck next week Juan."

    ReplyDelete
  6. GEROGE ALVAREZ: "Sorry I am late, I was picking a jury."

    ReplyDelete
  7. Judge Areces: "I got here early. My calendar ran smoothly and I finished early."

    Judge Adrien: "Hey. Me too. "

    ReplyDelete
  8. "Hi. I'm Patty Marino..... Nah...Just Marino."

    ReplyDelete
  9. MORE THINGS YOU CAN EXPECT TO HEAR NEXT THURSDAY --- NOT.

    Cecelia Chavez: I am not, I repeat Am Not, related to Hugo!

    Patty whatshernamethisweek Marino: I am, I repeat, I am related to Dan Marino.

    Ana Maria Pando: I'm early? No, way, I'm really early.

    Don Cohn to his wife: Honey, did you forget to bring the pens - where are those damn pens.

    Victoria del Pino & Joel Jacobi running against each other in Group 9: Hey Joel, ya know, if we add our amount of years together practicing law, well it almost adds up to our group number. Joel: "kewl"

    ReplyDelete
  10. Girl, you know it's false

    ReplyDelete
  11. Won't hear at the party? Hey Catalano let me buy you a drink!, Hey Rory Stein when is your training manual being published?, Judicial candidate to private attorney- You know that all that money you attorney donate doesn't all go to the campaign!, Jason Grey saying something nice about another lawyer, John Lipinski saying I can't believe they nolle prossed my case.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Judge Rothenberg: It felt so good to reverse the trial court and discharge your client.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Trial Lawyer at twilight of career: Waks? Reizenstein? Stein? Catalano? Gaer? Morin? Denaro? Hersch? Grey? Lurvey? Miller? Richardson? Grieco?...

    ReplyDelete
  14. "There is a great sale on ties at Nordstroms"

    Anonymous

    ReplyDelete
  15. Twilight of my career? I'm 44! Now i'm insulted.

    Phil R.

    ReplyDelete
  16. You're insulted? I'm 36 Juan M.

    ReplyDelete
  17. You're insulted? I'm 36 Juan M.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I know that "nutjob" hasn't been named in awhile, so long in fact that I've honestly forgot his name and can't find his website. I also want to be able to exercise my 1st amendment right to be sure that his Wikipedia entry is complete. So for good times' sake, can someone post the link "nutjob"'s wikipidia site and his informative justice page? I will fart in his general direction.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Hardwick has RSVP and will be passing out Menudo CD's so arrive early

    ReplyDelete
  20. thank me later, nutjob.

    ReplyDelete
  21. this just in a lawsuit has been filed against the Tobacco Road for allowing free speach, word has it hardwick is behind the suit

    ReplyDelete
  22. Upcoming Scene at Tobacco Road:

    Joel: Waiter, the french fries are not cispy. My good man, can you please take these back and speak with your chef?

    Me: Mah Blogga! Who da man? You da man.

    Joel: You sir are on bond and contacting me is a violation of your coniditons of bond. If you get re-arrested you will need Scott Saul to get you out.

    Me: Mah blogga! No bond. Judge Klein done gave me CTS. You da man mah blogga!

    Joel: Oh for goodness sakes. This horrid man is loose.

    Me: You da man. You dah blogga. Hey wait. Don't run. Come back here mah blogga!

    ReplyDelete
  23. even better. follow the link and have fun.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Scott Saul
    shouldn't take a fall
    a bondsman he does use
    no tie
    just a ruse.

    ReplyDelete
  25. What you won't hear at the Blogger Party at te Road:

    Judge Adrien: And I took my entire staff out for lunch this afternoon before coming here.

    ReplyDelete
  26. im counting the minutes, nutjob

    ReplyDelete
  27. Wont hear this at Tobacco Road:

    Nutjob: Joel, Mah Bloggah!

    Joel: Yes, I am the Blogger.

    ReplyDelete
  28. sorry thats hawaii time

    ReplyDelete
  29. Don't antagonize him. It's like teasing a mentally ill mule.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Because who is posting is not him. He just spams the comments section with the lists of lawyers in Florida. But if you are he who likes to threaten, then you are not welcome here. This is for lawyers, or at least people who graduated highschool and can behave like an adult without threatening to sue. That counts you out.

    ReplyDelete
  31. don't mess with me i will be at the party and we will duke it out

    ReplyDelete
  32. Keep it up and I will have to put moderation up. Enjoy the freedom while nutso is at his shrink's office.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Greico in the twilight if his career...I heard he's actually doing pretty well

    ReplyDelete
  34. Civil lawyer here. LMAO at the latest Joel D scene. I love those. Don't know the guy. But funny as can be.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Now Now Nutso. Didn't your doctor tell you not to do that?
    Keep it up and we might just have to have our members log on to wikipedia and start leaving comments. That would just drive you more insane than when Judge Hernandez wins re-election, wouldn't it? Now go take your medicine and write 100 times on your blackboard-

    "I will be a good nutjob and leave the blog alone."

    Your Pal:

    ReplyDelete
  36. Anonymous bloggers fear that their attendance at the Blog Party will reveal their identity. So lets just all assume that those who attend were "invited" by their blogging friends, and we are also there as a pre-election results celebration.
    Rumpole you should have an RSVP poll so to get an idea of who will be there.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Rump:
    i suggest beefed up police and fire protection at the blog party.

    you know nutjob will be there with a can of gasoline and a zippo.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Mommy mommy- the big boys are talking about me on the blog again. Make them stop. wahhhh/

    I want to be a big boy and sue people. When I grow up can I sue people?

    No Hardiwck, you have to graduate highschool and college.

    Hardwick: I'll show her. I'll show them. I'll sue them all. (Or at least threaten to).

    ReplyDelete
  39. Marino
    Pedrazza
    Whats a name?
    compared to 6 years
    of salary and fame.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Things you might see at the Blog party:

    Judge Karen Mills Francis with a fancy hat on

    Judge Leifman encouraging everyone to not partake of any alcoholic beverages

    Tony Marin drinking a beer

    Barbie Parks in her corvette

    Judge Murphy telling everyone to "Keep Murphy's Law."

    Tinkler going to the bathroom

    Bardewil saying "Vote for me."

    Gloria Gonzalez-Meyer smiling sweetly

    Don Cohn happily working the crowd and schmoozing with all his defense buddies

    And a good time to all!

    ReplyDelete
  41. where is mario garcia?

    ReplyDelete
  42. probably plotting with Parks against mendez

    ReplyDelete
  43. Jose Sanchez Gronlier
    a clerk
    a shark
    running for judge
    not a lark

    ReplyDelete
  44. LOL. Probably took the idiot who posted the Bar list about 10 minutes longer to post it then it did for me to scroll past it (3 seconds?). LOL. I say, leave moderation off and let this idiot continue to waste his time.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Mr. Lunatic- your medicine isn't working. It's friday afternoon. Don't you have any friends or any place to be?

    ReplyDelete
  46. Nutjob
    Hardwick
    likes to spam
    blew menudo
    wikipedia no fan

    ReplyDelete
  47. Well, nutjob has the attorney list on a file so it probably doesn't take him that long to post it. I can delete it in about 10 seconds but its a problem that being dealt with on higher levels.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Hardwick: "Well doctor there's this blog run by lawyers. And they won't listen to me. Then they started posting articles that I had a boyfriend and I sort of lost it."

    DR: What did you do?

    Hardwick:You know. The same old stuff. Pretended I knew the President of Google. Called Google and screamed a lot. Threatened to sue a lot of people and file bar complaints.

    DR. We may have to change your medicine.

    Hardwick: Again?

    Dr: Tell me more about your boyfriend.

    Hardwick: That's it. I'm suing you. And filing a complaint with DPR. Good Day Sir!!

    ReplyDelete
  49. You guys are silly. I like Scott. When I was an ASA, I allways enjoyed litigating with him, he also was very good at getting good deals for his clients and was never offensive. And, I enjoyed seeing the cowboy boots in Miami.

    s/ Scott Saul Fan

    ReplyDelete
  50. Hey Abba! Welcome to the blog.

    ReplyDelete
  51. I thought Grieco went on local TV and said he left the SAO to "start his own law firm." According to The Florida Bar's website, that did not happen. I guess you don't have as much power as you thought you did.

    ReplyDelete
  52. J Blecher
    DUI
    Essen n Essen
    Bobby Reiff
    not my type of guys

    ReplyDelete
  53. Scott Saul
    his cases he tries
    wearing a pair of dusty levis

    why so mean?
    why hate the guy?

    If you ask him nicely
    he'll loan you a tie.

    he comes to court
    doesn't give two hoots
    thats why he wears
    his cowboy boots

    his building he owns
    on 14th street
    like the way he dressses
    its not so neat

    this poem i wrote
    about an ok guy
    lets get him off the blog
    before he starts to cry

    ReplyDelete
  54. Rumpole- instead of this crop of laughable idiots, why don't we have quality attorneys like Miguel De La O running for Judge? Everyone respects him and he is a great lawyer and would be a great Judge in my humble opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  55. I miss the Sunny Posts.

    Party at Tobacco Road!!!
    The first round's on Sunny.

    ReplyDelete
  56. come on why is everyone picking on scott saul half the defense lawyers at MJB fee split with bail bondsmen?

    and the other half whine about the fact that they cant split a $750 fee for a dui.

    and those same people charging $750 for a dui will after sept 5 be known as "your honor"

    ReplyDelete
  57. haiku
    rory rory
    you really bore me
    those muffins why do you need?
    at least you dont have a hideous cod piece like mr weed

    ReplyDelete
  58. Miguel de la O a judge? While he couldnt be worse than the other traffic hacks who are gonna win on sept 5, his claim to fame is defending an alligator and getting into a pissing match with michael catalano.

    ReplyDelete
  59. What you will not hear at the party:

    "Oh look, Knovack Jones just arrived!"

    ReplyDelete
  60. "...all you need is love."

    ReplyDelete
  61. DeLaO probably would be a fine judge but the self promotion "anonymous" comments must end.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Since we are now the fashion police and have targeted scott saul's occasional lack of a tie I nominate N.W., rhymes with tacks, for worst groomed and dressed lawyer. why aren't you attacking him. Oh! I think I know why. Here is not a good lawyer who is a threat to you like saul.

    ReplyDelete
  63. There are a lot of qualified people who won't run for judge because they don't want to be part of the very seedy and even more expensive electoral process.

    There are plenty more who won't subject themselves to a nomination process because they don't have the right connections either. They too have seen the many super qualified people who failed to make it out of committee (of course, most of them will concede that the committee has done a better job than the voters who can't possibly know anything about the candidates since the rules forbid the candidates from saying anything real).

    So, we get stuck with lawyers who have 5 years experience (a pittance) or 20 years experience doing nothing cases who wouldn't know what to do with a jury if they stumbled over one. You know, lawyers who would be better suited as junior associates, paying others to try the cases they can't plead (yeah, I've seen lawyers doing that before), or flipping burgers. Lucky us.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Let's end the JNC process and give each candidate $25,000 in public financing to run for judge with no further contributions allowed.

    ReplyDelete
  65. I need psychiatric help if I resort to anonymous posts on this Blog to promote myself. Anyone who seeks self promotion here invites anonymous smears. I suspect my name was mentioned to either attract anonymous comments by those with an axe to grind, or by a well intentioned friend that isn't up to speed with some of the characters who post (or try to post) here.

    When the time comes, I will be happy to defend my qualifications to anyone who posts without the shield of anonymity.

    ReplyDelete
  66. By the way, loved the reference to Gwendolyn the male alligator. LOL. Someone has a long memory. Not sure if it is the highlight of my career, but easily in the top 3.

    Trivia question: What current judicial candidate represented the State?

    ReplyDelete
  67. "I need psychiatric help" finally a word of truth from miguel.

    Michael C

    ReplyDelete
  68. No. I do not believe anyone feels threatened by Scott. No one is beating up on NW because that would be utterly pathetic to pick on NW.

    ReplyDelete