This is what you say to the arrogant prosecutor who tells you their lab report and scientists have determined that your client is guilty.
Remind them that their office was one of the first to use the new, exciting, and now shown to be a totally fraudulent "science" of bite mark identification. Then ask them if they know how many defendants their office convicted on bite mark ID? Then, if you want to be really cruel, ask them if they know the office that sent Neil and Slappy to the Florida Supreme Court?
Then you can use the crude pejorative, send them this link, and go investigate their science.
The real point is, as one great and now departed criminal defense attorney told us when we were in law school, the only thing you waive (wave) in trial is the American Flag. Remember that it is our job as criminal defense attorneys to question everything- no matter how red in the face your judge gets for wasting their time, and no matter how much the prosecution and even sometimes the judge threatens your client with a trial tax.
Rumpole tip- when a prosecutor threatens an increased sentence after trial, ask them to put it in writing. They won't. They know it is a violation of their ethical duties, and yet they do it all the time and the outrage from the criminal defense community is far far less than we believe it should be.
Anyway, read the article and get inspired to fight.
Bite Mark Analysis is Junk Science.