JUSTICE BUILDING BLOG

WELCOME TO THE OFFICIAL RICHARD E GERSTEIN JUSTICE BUILDING BLOG. THIS BLOG IS DEDICATED TO JUSTICE BUILDING RUMOR, HUMOR, AND A DISCUSSION ABOUT AND BETWEEN THE JUDGES, LAWYERS AND THE DEDICATED SUPPORT STAFF, CLERKS, COURT REPORTERS, AND CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS WHO LABOR IN THE WORLD OF MIAMI'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE. POST YOUR COMMENTS, OR SEND RUMPOLE A PRIVATE EMAIL AT HOWARDROARK21@GMAIL.COM. Winner of the prestigious Cushing Left Anterior Descending Artery Award.

Wednesday, April 01, 2026

COURT POSED TO STRIKE DOWN PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT!

 A "source" shared this draft opinion poised to be released, possibly TODAY. It's a day we never thought we would see: your favourite appellate court striking down the proof beyond a reasonable doubt requirement in all criminal cases! 

In a 2-1 decision (and you pretty much know who is dissenting...)  that effectively sets fire to every law school criminal procedure textbook, the court has ruled that the "Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt" standard is—and I’m quoting here—"an antiquated burden that fails to meet the logistical demands of a modern, high-volume judiciary."

The court’s reasoning is a masterpiece of judicial gymnastics. They’ve introduced a new standard: "Clear and Articulable Suspicion of Guilt" (CASG).
Writing for the majority, the court noted that the "Beyond a Reasonable Doubt" standard was "never intended to be a shield for the guilty, but rather a hurdle that has become increasingly impassable in an era of complex forensic evidence and distracted jurors." From now on, if the State can show a "significant likelihood" that the defendant was "involved in the general vicinity of the alleged unpleasantness," the burden shifts to the defense to prove innocence by a "preponderance of the evidence."

The "Golden Thread" of English Common Law hasn't just been cut; it’s been shredded and used for confetti.

We suppose it makes our upcoming retirement on June 30th look less like a departure and more like a daring escape from a sinking ship. Only today could we post something like this. We fool you not!

27 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well done. In today’s world, not such a crazy headline!!!

Sir Wilfred Cedricsson, Lord of Ivanhoe said...

I hereby officially announce my campaign for Circus Court Judge. I will be a fair Judge and always give the maximum to those who lose at trial because I was shocked by the State’s overwhelming evidence of Guilt. Especially the 28 8x10 color pictures with a paragraph on the back explaining their evidentiary value

Donald Trumpet said...

I have just signed an Executive Order to streamline the US Criminal Justice System. Effective immediately the Presumption of I innocence is abolished and the US will follow a new standard called the Presumption of Guilt . Furthermore the new procedures will be Hang them first then give them a fair trial ( unless their rich or my Epstein friends )

Anonymous said...

FOOLS!

Anonymous said...

Ex parte communication!

Siddhartha Finch said...

It was only a matter of time.

Anonymous said...

And a Happy April 1st to you as well.

Anonymous said...

So you think you have what it takes to be a prosecutor? Do you have a chronic disregard for rules and laws, persistent deceitfulness, extreme impulsivity, excessive manipulation, callous lack of empathy, reckless disregard for safety, and a lack of remorse for hurting others. Well then welcome to “The best team in America”.

Anonymous said...

Buh Bye Pamster!

Anonymous said...

So true!

Anonymous said...

Renier Diaz de la Portilla filed against Gordon Murray yesterday. I'm starting to see a pattern here. Could it possibly be a prank?

Anonymous said...

So you think you have what it takes to be a criminal defense attorney? Do you have a chronic disregard for rules and laws, persistent deceitfulness, extreme impulsivity, excessive manipulation, callous lack of empathy, reckless disregard for safety, and a lack of remorse for hurting others. Well then welcome to the criminal defense bar.

Anonymous said...

Here’s my 5 dollar donation.

Anonymous said...

So true. You got it pal.

Anonymous said...

So original 😂

Anonymous said...

The delusional unoriginal prosecutor.

Anonymous said...

Thanks Judge Bronwyn Miller for your contribution to the blog. This was of course, as you so wisely recognized in your secret texts to KFR, the actual problem with Michael Von Zamft, he just couldn’t get the criminal defense lawyer stink off him. Takes a learned judge to recognize that prosecutors are always justified in whatever they do because their opponents are so evil, making prosecutors on the side of Good always and automatically.

Anonymous said...

@3:23 sarcasm or stupidity?

Anonymous said...

What a shit show. Restore ethical behavior at the SAO, the voters deserve better.

Anonymous said...

I believe that was sarcasm

Anonymous said...

Prank

Anonymous said...

none of this was sarcasm. stop gaslighting.

Anonymous said...

https://www.voterfocus.com/CampaignFinance/candidate_pr.php?el=30&c=miamidade

Neil J. Gillespie said...

The Florida Bar Daily News Summary April 6, 2026
https://www.floridabar.org/news/dns/?date=20260406

Michael Von Zamft, the veteran prosecutor ousted from the case of a Miami gang boss — which unraveled after allegations of prosecutorial misconduct — could face discipline by The Florida Bar. A complaint filed by The Florida Bar against now-retired Von Zamft stemmed from his handling of the case of Corey Smith, who had been sentenced to death for killing four people in Liberty City in the 1990s. Smith’s case was back in Miami court in 2024 after he was granted a new death penalty sentencing hearing. The nine-page complaint, which was filed last Friday [March 27] in the Florida Supreme Court, mostly focuses on the findings made by Miami-Dade Circuit Court Judge Andrea Wolfson, who removed Von Zamft and prosecutor Stephen Mitchell from Smith’s case in March 2024.

Florida Bar files complaint against Miami prosecutor ousted from case of gang leader, Miami Herald, April 1, 2026

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article315253857.html#storylink=cpy

Anonymous said...

That’s pretty funny considering I’m sitting here watching the state loose yet another case because of lack of evidence.

Anonymous said...

Hahaha

Anonymous said...

🤣