Sunday, October 22, 2006

TODAY'S PICKS



Arizona -3 over Oakland.

Carolina +3.5 over the slumping Bengals

NE -5 over the Bills

Haven’t lost an over/under pick all year: two for you today:

Under 41 Houston at Jacksonville
&
Under 45 Cincinnati at Carolina.


BEST BET: Miami US Attorney's Office -$250,000.00 over Shohat and Lehr.

See You In Court Tomorrow (seems like it's time for a vacation.)

24 comments:

  1. this blog still gets visitors?

    ReplyDelete
  2. thanks for the unders!!!!!!

    you tthe man

    maybe you should start a 1-900 number lol

    ReplyDelete
  3. The justice building blog is now the football blog.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Currently, the blog's readership is at an all-time LOW.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey Nick Saban: Maybe its time to rethink the angry army general type of coaching style. You are 1-6 and preside over a bunch that you let laugh their way through training camp thinking they were going to the Super Bowl. The season is over, start playing the youngsters.

    ReplyDelete
  6. FOX Sports is really hurting with these announcers. Whats up with that broads hair, not to mention the meathead next to her....

    ReplyDelete
  7. kenny has pine tar on his hands

    ReplyDelete
  8. Perhaps its the end of the blog? It wouldn't be too soon ... sorry, rump, but some rocks should not be turned over!

    ReplyDelete
  9. why, why is the blog ending this way.

    is there no more lies or rumors to be said.

    why, why is the blog ending this way.

    is there no more stupid jokes at the expense of some PD or ASA or Judge.

    oh why....

    ReplyDelete
  10. get ready for election night returns and put this link on your favorites

    http://election.dos.state.fl.us/Elections/ResultsArchive/DetailRpt.Asp?ELECTIONDATE=11/07/2006&RACE=D32&PARTY=&DIST=003&GRP=&DATAMODE=E

    ReplyDelete
  11. I heard Nick Saban adopted a kid today! The boy was being beaten by his parents, so the judge awarded custody to Saban because he doesn't beat anybody!...J-E-T-S, Jets, Jets, Jets! I'll be here all week...don't forget to tip your waitresses and bartenders.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The Miami Herald changes it mind and Endorces Cathy Parks. It was in the Herald today.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Migna has taken over the Blog.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Is that true about Cathy Parks?

    ReplyDelete
  15. There is nothing lowly about this blog. Face it children, we are in football season, and I for one can't wait for the next week's games. I just wish the Dolphins could get their act together. I had such high hopes for Harrington.

    Rump, I appreciate your insights regarding the games, and I use your piks to evaluate my own. By the way, I am in the graeatest and most FUN football pool ever.

    And for you above, yes, it's true--the herald has done a complete and utter turn-around and endorsed Parks---that is unless the herald made a "typo" but that's really doubtful.

    ReplyDelete
  16. It is true that the Herald made a "typo", and then reprinted their endorsements today, correctly listing Marisa Tinkler Mendez.

    The Miami Herald endorses Marisa Tinkler Mendez for Circuit Court Judge, Group 80. Parks, to my knowledge, although she CLAIMS to have the endorsement of AFSCME (they do not endorse Dade judicial races, contrary to what Parks claims), does not have any endorsements in this race.

    Joel Ogelsby is responsible for the "typo" in yesterday's paper and for issuing any corrective statements (jogelsby@herald.com.

    It is official that Marisa Tinkler Mendez does, indeed, have The Miami Herald's endorsement and quite sad and unacceptable that they chose the first day of early voting to print their endorsements with a "typo" wherein they "accidentally" listed the unendorsed opponent.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Joel Oglesby
    joglesby@herald.com
    305.376.3505

    ReplyDelete
  18. yea well they are smoking crack over at oglesby office. Endorsing Rothenberg give me a break?

    They must be smoking crack.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I can't believe that Bob Levy actually is allowed to write on this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Parks does have AFSCME's endorsement, and she can prove it.
    Nice try, levy

    ReplyDelete
  21. I posted the comment regarding Parks' alleged endorsements and I am not Levy. A mere individual appalled at Parks' lack of qualification, her negative campaigning, over zealous filing of lawsuits against candidates, etc.

    Shouldn't you be at the polls working and greeting voters and off the blog negative campaigning Parks???

    Sad part is that Parks can win merely because of her name recognition and, if this blog is any indication, people are buying into her lies.

    ReplyDelete
  22. As a follow up to the AFSCME endorsement issue, I spoke with Janice at AFSCME Council 79, who assures me that AFSCME IS NOT ENDORSING ANY CIRCUIT COURT JUDICIAL CANDIDATES. The reason behind this is simple - AFSCME did not have time to finish screening Circuit Court judicial candidates and will not, therefore, endorse any of the Circuit Court Judicial candidates. CATHERINE PARKS IS NOT ENDORSED BY AFSCME. THIS IS A FACT. CATHERINE PARKS IS NOT ENDORSED BY AFSCME. Note to Parks and Parks Fan Club: please, do not offer to "prove" that you have endorsements when you, in fact, do actually have them.

    AFSCME endorses Jose L. "Joe" Fernandez, County Court candidate in Group 43.

    AFL-CIO and its affiliates endorse Valerie R. Manno Schurr, Circuit Court candidate in Group 78, Marisa Tinkler Mendez, Circuit Court candidate in Group 80 and Jose L. "Joe" Fernandez, County Court candidate in Group 43.

    And NO - this is not Levy, Mendez, et al. This is a blogger who actually checks and verifies facts, preferring to go directly to a source of information for verification rather than voting based on the usual rumors posted by Parks and Parks Fan Club, conveniently located on the Justice Building Blog.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anonymous said...

    Parks does have AFSCME's endorsement, and she can prove it.
    Nice try, levy

    Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:08:23 AM

    HOW CAN SHE PROVE IT? IT DOES NOT EXIST! NICE TRY PARKS!

    ReplyDelete