It's not "R OC K in the U S A" but still...
CLE ON WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 25, 2023. Starting at 4pm. Topic: SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States for you DS Drones) Year in Review.
Courtroom 4-1 REGIB
If you cannot make it, we will give you all you need to know:
SCOTUS 2022 Opinions: Appeals by Defendant: Per Curiam Affirmed; Appeals by the Government: Per Curiam Reversed; with a double secret Affirmed for all death penalty appeals.
SCOTUS MOTTO: Jus callin balls and strikes and upholding precedents (unless it involves abortion or the exclusionary rule).
Special Guest Appearance by a recent MAGA/DeSantis Drone speaking on "Why I don't clear all my rulings with the Federalist Society" and "Don't count out appealing those not guilty verdicts"
FACDL EMAIL:
Hi everyone,
Tomorrow’s CLE, Supreme Court Year in Review 2022-2023, with Judge Milton Hirsch, will be in Courtroom 4-1. We’re starting at 4pm.
If you haven’t signed up already, you can register here: Sign up for SCOTUS Year in Review with Judge Hirsch
SCOTUS and you know who. A study in pomposity in 37 eight hour acts. Sign up now only $12,995,00!!! What a deal !
ReplyDeleteShumie doomie doomie doomie doomie doomie do!
ReplyDeleteWould someone tell Judge Armas Bach that giving us only 2 months to be ready for a DUI case is going to get him major opposition in the next election.
ReplyDeleteAt the first sounding, you get just one continuance on a DUI and he resets it two weeks later. On top of that you only get about two weeks to watch hours of BWC and be prepared.
His mother, Judge Mercedes Bach was great and never would have done that crap.
Memo to Judge Bach, WE NEED TIME TO GET PAID.
My guess is that if you come in and specifically detail the number of hours of BWC to review, the outstanding discovery, and the documents you may want to get via other avenues (breathalyzer docs, etc) that you can get more time. Even putting on the Blog that the reason you need more time is to make sure the client pays isn’t going to help things! There’s no constitutional principle, caselaw, or rule of Florida Crim Pro you can cite for that reason. Lay a record based on case specifics and anchor it to 6th Amendment effectiveness principles and you’ll have more success.
DeleteBach = another guy who never tried a case before a jury and never had to represent someone faced with losing their liberty. In other words, "I'd rather collect a paycheck from the state" than run my own practice.
ReplyDelete3:28 saying the quiet part out loud.
ReplyDeleteYou don't need more time to prepare but to get paid. Bravo sir.
@ 11:54am, that's evident to all of us who are in private practice. You know who that's not evident to? Judges who've never spent a day of their life running their own practice. In other words, lawyers who prior to getting a robe, just showed up, clocked in and clocked out and collected a check at their firms and didn't have the balls to go solo. That's why they're clueless.
ReplyDelete