Thursday, February 17, 2022

PRONOUNS

 We are too old to understand, but when we see Twitter accounts and emails ending with pronouns, we are not sure why they are necessary. 

BUT that being said, would we be correct in saying that since our first post when we assumed the "Royal We" are we correct in saying that our pronouns are 

WE, US, OURS? 

If people need to announce their pronouns, shouldn't they also announce their blood type? 

"She, her, hers, O+"

"OMG, Heidy has been in a horrible traffic accident. She's in the hospital and needs blood. Let me check her Twitter and see her, hers, blood type."

Wouldn't that save more lives? 

And once we have safety covered, shouldn't politics and vaccine status be also required besides pronouns. 

"We have a meeting with Mr. Dewey of Dewey Cheetum and Howe for lunch. Hmm, on LinkedIn it's He, Him, Blood Type B, he's had his vaccines and boosters, and he thinks Biden stole the election. Make a note not to mention Georgia or Arizona or Pennsylvania in the meeting please."

And there's more. 

She, Her, Blood Type O-, Triple vax'd, Biden Won, Fauci told the truth, No Fish, moderately high blood pressure, no foreign films, been to Disney, Eagles Fan, Cheesesteak wit, American Airlines' Frequent Flyer, Uber over Lyft, no fan of the designated hitter rule, divorced twice, prefer missionary, cannabis gummies only, masks, diet sprite, decafe only, DiMaggio over Williams, Brady Cheated, Tex Mex rules, don't get Johnny Depp, Kim K should go back to Ye and leave Pete, Breaking Bad over Sopranos, Disney+, Tesla owner, Eth over Polygon, Burger King over McDonalds, NY Style over Deep Dish, Steinbeck over Hemingway, Berlin over Paris,  ....and on and on. 

Whatever happened to first and last names? 

Spare us the "insensitive blockhead" emails. We embrace all people, cultures, races, sexual preferences and identities, just not Bill Belichick and Hollywood blockbusters and Judges who vary upward after trial.



12 comments:

  1. why even type "Steinbeck over Hemingway"? no one would ever say that other than a Steinbeck relative

    ReplyDelete
  2. What's the point of this post?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jonathan Schwartz gets 3 year license suspension

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I read that. I thought it was creative lawyering. Times have changed. I'm sure his dubious reputation didn't help.

      Delete
    2. No I don't. You have a suspension.

      Delete
  4. Who cares about all that stuff? The only important question people should be stating after self pro-nouning is: Ginger or Maryann?

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Jonathan Schwartz gets 3 year license suspension."

    That's for the 2017 bar disciplinary case. He still has two more pending disciplinary matters.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I will never stop "practicing law"

    ReplyDelete
  7. I will never stop "practicing law." See you in court.

    -JSS

    ReplyDelete
  8. Outrageous trial tax!

    "A Tennessee woman was sentenced last month to six years and one day in prison for illegally registering to vote while on probation. Given the nature of the offense, that punishment has been widely characterized as unnecessarily harsh by activists, advocacy groups, and the prosecutor who sought it.

    One of these things is not like the other. But while Shelby County District Attorney Amy Weirich agrees that prison term isn't proportional to the offense, she says it is justified for a different reason: the defendant, Pamela Moses, insisted on going to trial.

    "I gave her a chance to plead to a misdemeanor with no prison time," Weirich said in a statement. "She requested a jury trial instead. She set this unfortunate result in motion and a jury of her peers heard the evidence and convicted her."

    Six years of freedom is quite the steep price to pay for exercising her constitutional right to trial."

    https://reason.com/2022/02/17/pamela-moses-voter-fraud-requested-jury-trial-6-years-in-prison/

    ReplyDelete