Today is the first Monday in October. You know what that means?
Pumpkins for sale, along with your favourite pumpkin ale.
The weather was a bit cooler and drier this weekend.
And oh yeah, the Supreme Court is back in session after a well deserved summer break.
The cases to be heard before the court this year span the gamut of the First Amendment, Religious Freedom for Prisoners, the Status of Jerusalem (Zivotofsky v. Kerry, No. 13-628- whether Congress can force the State Department to consider Jerusalem the capital of Israel), the right to same-sex marriage (otherwise known as the right to be as miserable as the rest of society) Affordable Care redux, Voting rights kerfuffles, and in perhaps our favourite case so far, whether White Collar Laws apply to ......fisherman.
Whether a grouper is like a email is at the crux of Yates v. United States, No. 13-7451, in which the application of the Sarbanes-Oxley act's prohibition against the destruction of evidence applies to a fisherman who tossed a couple of allegedly undersized red grouper overboard before federal agents could seize the piscatorial evidence.
There's a case about the interpretation of rap music, a form of entertainment known to make Justice Scalia swoon with delight, and there is a case about the size of a prisoner's beard.
All in all, it is shaping up to be a very interesting term.
See you in court, just not that court. Red grouper cases are so below us.
ReplyDeleteThe Captain Reports:
From the NYTimes .....
Supreme Court Clears Way for Gay Marriage in 5 States
The Supreme Court on Monday denied review in all five pending same-sex marriage cases, clearing the way for such marriages to proceed in Indiana, Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin.
The move was a major surprise and suggests that the justices are not going to intercede in the wave of decisions in favor of same-sex marriage at least until a federal appeals court upholds a state ban.
Cap Out .....
BREAKING. From the Miami Herald.
ReplyDeleteLife in prison for teen in fatal Miami Gardens carjacking
BY DAVID OVALLE
Eric Ellington, the teen who shot and killed a man during a carjacking “because he didn’t look scared enough,” will be spending the rest of his life behind bars.
“You have forfeited the right to ever be free,” Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Miguel de la O told Ellington on Monday during a sentencing hearing.
Eric Ellington, 19, had been facing up to life in prison for the murder of Julian Soler, 23, during the robbery at a Miami Gardens Mobil gas station in July 2011.
Soler had his hands up when Ellington unleashed a flurry of gunshots at Soler — a murder captured on video surveillance and shown at trial.
“You shot a man in cold blood and you shot him eight times and you kept shooting him,” de la O said. “You wanted him to die.”
During the carjacking, one of Ellington’s cohorts also shot and killed Soler’s friend, Kennia Duran, 24.
Jurors in March convicted Ellington of two counts of first-degree murder and a slew of other counts. Co-defendants Wayne Williams and Dylan McFarlane are awaiting trial.
Adults in Florida convicted of first-degree murder face mandatory life in prison without the possibility of parole.
However, the U.S. Supreme Court in 2012 banned such automatic sentences for juveniles in murder cases. Judges can still mete out life in prison, but must consider evidence of a defendant’s youth.
Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/article2530613.html#storylink=cpy
How many times does the Supreme Court have to say no to life for kids with murder cases before judge listen?
ReplyDeleteNo life without considering the defendant's age at the time of the offense. Judge De La O considered it and still felt that Eric Ellington was a piece of shit who deserved nothing less than life.
ReplyDeleteIf there is one case that should terrify us all, it is that one. The victims were chosen at random. Could have been any one of us. With trash like Ellington on the streets nobody is safe.
Probably once, but since they've never said that it's hard to guess.
ReplyDeleteI am just curious how a fisherman can be charged with a document shredding crime by NOAA's Law Enforcement, when the head of NOAA's law enforcement, Dale Jones, was in front of Congress at the same time for shredding 80% of his files during a federal investigation by the Inspector General's Office because of complaints of fishermen. He was not charged with violation of Sarbanes-Oxley. He was not even fired. He still has his 6 figure salary and just a lateral move in his position.
ReplyDelete