We surrender today. 41 posts. Arguments raging back and forth. Cites to the Judicial Code Of Conduct. Mostly good stuff, but we feel a bit overwhelmed. Gratified to have readers, but overwhelmed nonetheless.
However, this witty post made our day and deserves front page status:
Anonymous wrote:
When I read that D'Arce said he was targeted on Suspicion of Being Rumpole (SOBR), I nearly dropped my danish I was laughing so hard. But Rory was nearby, so I thought better of it.
Rumpole replies, observe the anatomy of a clever post: 1) It creates a new acronym SOBR, which is relevant and is hereby adopted (although we loathe the subject); 2) it references a continuing joke from our earliest days when no one was reading us. Great post, take a bow.
To the reader thoughtful enough to post the Miami “no credit” Herald article written by a woman who has been banned from the blog- since we banned her, we will not reprint her trite tripe. We are not referring to our favorite Herald scribe Oh Susannah, but that writer of tepid talk of the town.
D’Arce is done. He has been examined more thoroughly than Dick Cheney’s shotgun. Hopefully, tomorrow brings new topics.
See You In Court.
Sung to the tune of Cole Porter’s De-lovely.
ReplyDeleteThe election is near, and the skies are clear
And if you want to be a judge dear
It's delightful, it's delicious, it's D’Arces.
I understand the reason why
You're running for judge,
well so am I
It's delightful, it's delicious, it's D’Arces
So please be sweet, my chickadee
And when I bill ya mucho bucks, say to me
"It's delightful, it's delicious, it's delectable, it's delirious,
It's dilemma, it's de limit, it's deluxe, it's D’Arces.
Sung to the theme from COPS
ReplyDelete(Picture a drunk shirtless guy outside a trailer with some ugly girl yelling with a beer and cigarette in her hand)
Bad boy bad boy, whatcha gonna do?
Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
Is this another act of censorship. What is wrong with you, Rump? What is your agenda? Who are your masters?
ReplyDeleterump you told us that you were a former prosecutor. you told us that back in december. you really are old arent you?
ReplyDeleteWhat about the news that Lynn Overmann got a City of Miami cop arrested for perjury? Check out the Miami Herald Local section today 3/2/08.
ReplyDeletemrs. overmann is a good girl and a good lawyer. but you already are aware or you wouldnt have hired her.
ReplyDelete"The difference between the right word and the almost right word is the difference between lightning and a lightning bug."
ReplyDelete-Mark Twain
Hey , Who read puddi'nhead Wilson?
ReplyDeleteWhat censorship??? We have no agenda, and our only master is She Who Must Be Obeyed.
ReplyDeleteZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
ReplyDeleteZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
ReplyDelete[deleted]
ReplyDeleteZ - I have a question for you:
ReplyDeleteY?
Here is the most interesting part of the case you posted.
ReplyDeleteSupreme Court of Puerto Rico.
Angel Luis García, Carmen García et al., Plaintiffs and respondents
v.
World Wide Entertainment Co., Darrin McGillis, Defendants and petitioners
No. CE-92-126
San Juan, Puerto Rico, December 24, 1992
"The plaintiffs alleged that both contracts were void because they were contrary to law, morals and public policy. As second cause of action, plaintiffs alleged that defendants (McGillis and boyfriend) had physically abused and sexually harassed the minor, for which they sought damages."