tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post6242986585724025950..comments2024-03-29T07:16:39.273-04:00Comments on THE BLOG: THOMPSON V TUNIS continuedRumpolehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08380575650255695462noreply@blogger.comBlogger38125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-21715012734253552752008-03-04T01:08:00.000-05:002008-03-04T01:08:00.000-05:00The unfortunate fact you appear to keep missing Mr...The unfortunate fact you appear to keep missing Mr Thompson is the fact that whatever Judge Tunis may or may not have done, it has no reflection whatsoever on your own behaviour, as has been mentioned to you on numerous occasions by numerous sources, the reason you are up in front of a disciplinary board is NOT because Judge Tunis may or may not have signed a form several years ago.<BR/><BR/>You are in front of a disciplinary hearing for insulting Judges, spewing out 'Press Releases' when told not to, comparing one Judge to someone who would 'wave children in front of traffic', the list goes on and on.<BR/><BR/>The reason you were called to show cause with your filings was because, even when facing a disciplinary board, you STILL seem to think that this is something to do with other people. In the first chapter of your book, you mentioned that you blamed 'things' for your problems. How is diverting blame to Video Games, Gamers, Lawyers, Anonymous bloggers, Samuel L Jackson impressionists, Judges, Doctors, Scientists, Journalists and Industry figures any different? <BR/><BR/>It's always everyone but you isn't it Mr Thompson? Even when you send a letter that is designed to insult the intelligence of the recipients and they take offence at those insults, it's still their fault, not yours for being insulting in the first place.<BR/><BR/>It's never been about your ideals Mr Thompson, it's about your attitudes and your behaviour, the problem is you are too focussed on your own convictions to be able to stand outside yourself and see exactly how rude, offensive and presumptuous you truly are.<BR/><BR/>For the main part Lawyers do a necessary job, like them or hate them, we respect them, your actions bring that public trust into question, when they see a lawyer doing everything EXCEPT answer the charge that has been bought against him, it does not instil confidence into the public.<BR/><BR/>You set out to make enemies Mr Thompson, there's no point pretending you didn't, but you got carried away didn't you? Forgot that your position as a lawyer carries a responsibility to people other than yourself and your own personal crusade, and now it is time to pay the piper, you wriggle and squirm and attempt to avoid responsibility through sleight of hand and mis-direction.<BR/><BR/>You know as well as everyone else on this board that Judge Tunis' signature has nothing whatsoever to do with your behaviour, it is a glaring attempt to 'get off on a technicality', and one that is, as you well know, nothing more than a delaying tactic.<BR/><BR/>You may keep your legal briefs to yourself, you already got into trouble over Gay Porn once, we wouldn't want a repeat of the incident, and, all things considered, the fact that you are Jack Thompson and I'm Not is a fact I give thanks to God for every single day.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-85296947156715388742008-02-26T08:45:00.000-05:002008-02-26T08:45:00.000-05:00Dear Anonymous Posting Morons:Judge Farina has now...Dear Anonymous Posting Morons:<BR/><BR/>Judge Farina has now secured a criminal investigation of Tunis' forgery.<BR/><BR/>So kiss my legal briefs.<BR/><BR/>Jack Thompson, and you're notAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-34270118869341605132008-02-20T10:39:00.000-05:002008-02-20T10:39:00.000-05:00Ah. Following an age old Maxim, are you Jack? If y...Ah. Following an age old Maxim, are you Jack? If you can't Dazzle them with Brilliance, Baffle them with Bullshit.<BR/><BR/>You're doing a fine job at it too.<BR/><BR/>And just THINK of all the enemies you're making in the process. You should be proud.<BR/><BR/>AgnostoTheoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-83280545337341785892008-02-18T22:58:00.000-05:002008-02-18T22:58:00.000-05:00I used to enjoy reading this blog to catch up on e...I used to enjoy reading this blog to catch up on everything that was going on in the building, while I am running from courtroom to courtroom really trying to get quality work done. Now it is always a disappointment becasue all I ever see are comments from this Jack Thompson person who is the most critical narcissic commenter about anything & everyone on this blog. He is clogging the blog. Please get rid of him. We are all sick of this man.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-71826403988370019642008-02-09T21:41:00.000-05:002008-02-09T21:41:00.000-05:00Jack,GO AWAY.Jack,<BR/><BR/>GO AWAY.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-89942474193606391812008-02-09T16:09:00.000-05:002008-02-09T16:09:00.000-05:00Uh, Jack....You forgot to answer my question, as y...Uh, Jack....<BR/><BR/>You forgot to answer my question, as you often do.<BR/><BR/>Why would anyone forge Judge Tunis' signature on a "loyaly oath"? Answer, please. It's a mystery equal to the identity of the Black Dahlia killer.<BR/><BR/>Judge Tunis' recommendation to the "disloyal" Florida Supreme Court is being typed while you're writing your endless, and futile, motions to recuse her. Bye Bye........Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-65226758706539502852008-02-08T19:26:00.000-05:002008-02-08T19:26:00.000-05:00To Jack's fact checker:is this also part of the 'd...To Jack's fact checker:<BR/>is this also part of the 'denying all discovery' that's been alleged? Can you take the depo of the designated reviwer? It seems like taking the depo of the prosecutor who signed off on charges at the felony intake or like taking a depo of a PD who filed a defense witness list so you can ask why it was filed. He keeps saying Tunis denies all discovery. Doesn't sound like the Judge Tunis I've seen threaten to exclude witness if we don't comply with motions to compel and rules to show cause. What are we missing, probably nothing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-75190496140104472542008-02-08T18:43:00.000-05:002008-02-08T18:43:00.000-05:00When Thompson says, Judge Tunis then filed subsequ...When Thompson says, Judge Tunis then filed subsequent loyalty oaths which were not notarized, what is he talking about. Do you mean the Oath of Office? They do not need to be notarized. Has anyone read the statute. He's citing a loyalty oath that applies to ALL state employees on the payroll. So if you are a toll collector, school employee, public works employee, it is all the same. The statute he's citing has. NOTHING to do with judges & their duties.<BR/><BR/>We have been reading his messages and pleadings for the past few months. Check out the fla. Supreme Ct website. He's been at it with Judge Tunis for about a year. She has denied his motions to recuse& been upheld by the supremes each time. On this blog we frequently talk about judges with no b---s or back-bone, what does it say about her that she refuses to cave? I'm sure her life would be easier without this in it. She's earned her stripes in my eyes.<BR/><BR/>Signed a non-criminal attorney who just reads Rump's blogAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-74114538889345403472008-02-08T12:48:00.000-05:002008-02-08T12:48:00.000-05:00Good god, man, get a grip. First, it is NOT uneth...Good god, man, get a grip. <BR/><BR/>First, it is NOT unethical for a judge to receive or accept a donation from a lawyer with a matter pending before the judge. It is not even unethical to sit on the judge's reelection committee. I would cite you the cases, but I doubt you'd read them.<BR/><BR/>Second, even if that wasn't the law, Ben Kuehne is NOT, under any fanciful extrapolation your overwrought paranoid mind can concoct, "before" Judge Tunis in your grievance matter. It isn't even a close call. Here's what the Bar Rules say about the role of the "Designated Reviewer" from the Board of Governors: <A HREF="http://www.floridabar.org/divexe/rrtfb.nsf/FV/D9DA49160865FCB4852571630071B13C" REL="nofollow">Rule 3-7.5</A>.<BR/>Ben's role was to review the Grievance Committee's recommendation to file charges against you. He apparently saw nothing wrong with the charges and allowed the process to continue. For this he gets a lifetime of grief from you? Ben serves on the Board of Governors without compensation (they don't even get their expenses reimbursed), and you besmirch his good name all over the web because he did his job? Then you take advantage of his misfortune to try and excuse your own disgraceful conduct? You are a parasite who doesn't deserve to belong to the same Bar as Ben.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-10322421719136656822008-02-08T08:57:00.000-05:002008-02-08T08:57:00.000-05:00Dear Anonymous Moron:She didn't "forge her own sig...Dear Anonymous Moron:<BR/><BR/>She didn't "forge her own signature." Somebody else did. That's what a forgery is. I guess you just failed the sanity test.<BR/><BR/>She then filed and actually signed, all by herself, subsequent Loyalty Oaths that are not compliant with state law.<BR/><BR/>As a lawyer, you ought to know that the whole justice systems rests upon the reliability of oaths, right, or did you go to Oklahoma Jurisprudence University?<BR/><BR/>Jack ThompsonAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-90036883984839175992008-02-08T08:51:00.000-05:002008-02-08T08:51:00.000-05:00IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDATHE FL...IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA<BR/><BR/>THE FLORIDA BAR,<BR/><BR/> Complainant,<BR/><BR/>v. Case Numbers SC 07 - 80 and 07- 354<BR/><BR/>JOHN B. THOMPSON,<BR/> <BR/> Respondent.<BR/><BR/>SUPPLEMENT TO RESPONDENT’S VERIFIED MOTION TO DISQUALIFY REFEREE TUNIS<BR/><BR/> COMES NOW respondent, John B. Thompson, hereinafter Thompson, on his own behalf, and supplements his motion to this court to recuse herself from this matter, stating:<BR/> Has Dava Tunis lost her mind? Apparently she has.<BR/> It would be bad enough if she were to have accepted a campaign contribution from Ben Kuehne before she became the referee herein and did not disclose that fact, but it is far worse than that.<BR/> What she did was receive and keep a donation from Ben Kuehne AFTER <BR/>this Bar matter was assigned to her and AFTER she was told by Thompson, in writing, that Kuehne had received a target letter which has now resulted in his indictment by the federal government. Can a judge legally, ethically receive a money gift from someone after a case in which he is involved is assigned to her? Of course not. <BR/>I solemnly affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing facts are true, correct, and complete, so help me God. <BR/>I HEREBY CERTIFY that this has been provided this February 8, 2008, to Bar staff counsel Sheila Tuma, to Kenneth Marvin, Director of Lawyer Regulation for The Bar, and to all Bar Governors as well as to Bar President Frank Angones and to the JQC. <BR/><BR/> <BR/>JOHN B. THOMPSON, Attorney<BR/>Florida Bar #231665<BR/>1172 South Dixie Hwy., Suite 111<BR/>Coral Gables, Florida 33146<BR/>305-666-4366<BR/>amendmentone@comcast.netAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-31612164792791821422008-02-07T21:32:00.000-05:002008-02-07T21:32:00.000-05:00Jack asked a very valid question: "Am I insane?" ...Jack asked a very valid question: "Am I insane?" I think he's afraid of the answer.....Now as to whether to believe the purported expert onpinion of Carlos Baggett--dean at a place called "Handwriting University"-- I must ask, Jack, why on earth would Judge Tunis forge her own signature? Or, for that matter, why would anyone else do so? Jack, all this is hogwash--and you well know it. She's going to recommend that you be disciplined--the smart money is on disbarment--and you are desperately trying to find something to derail her from doing it. Hey, here's a prediction for everyone: now that Ben Kuehne has been indicted, Jack will drop his crusade to ensure that loyalty oath signatures are genuine. He will instead focus on Ben's indictment as his salvation from the eternal hell of disbarment. Here's the argument: "Ben was my designated reviewer; Ben has been indicted for money laundering; an indictment means guilt, and therefore Ben is guilty; a man guilty of a crime must be corrupt in all other ways; ergo, my bar prosection was corrupt and the case must be forever dismissed." Clear logic, in Jack's world. But it won't work. Bye Bye Jack.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-24734339812372132422008-02-07T12:07:00.000-05:002008-02-07T12:07:00.000-05:00What is going on in the world -- first Ben Kuehne,...What is going on in the world -- first Ben Kuehne, and now I am tending to agree with Jack about the loyalty oaths....<BR/><BR/>But does the statute specify the appropriate penalty for not having the sworn oath?South Florida Lawyershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00810384287103818406noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-81129661148968305202008-02-07T11:47:00.000-05:002008-02-07T11:47:00.000-05:00OMG...Ben Kuehne has been indicted!!!http://www.mi...OMG...Ben Kuehne has been indicted!!!<BR/><BR/>http://www.miamiherald.com/news/breaking_news/story/409964.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-84142769139159549652008-02-07T11:42:00.000-05:002008-02-07T11:42:00.000-05:00Ben Kuehne, my designated reviewer in all my Bar m...Ben Kuehne, my designated reviewer in all my Bar matters, has just been indicted, as I predicted, and you folks here didn't believe it. I get a whole new Bar proceeding because of this crook. Is this a great country, or what?<BR/><BR/>Oh, I'm sure the dullards here will say that complaining about a designated reviewer for The Bar who has been on the take and who is processing Bar complaints by wealthy corporations is "nitpicking." Kiss my briefs.<BR/><BR/>Jack ThompsonAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-77231069135674503702008-02-07T10:50:00.000-05:002008-02-07T10:50:00.000-05:00Rump,You are missing the story of the day regardin...Rump,<BR/>You are missing the story of the day regarding Ben Kuehne.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-44434983787080015872008-02-07T10:43:00.000-05:002008-02-07T10:43:00.000-05:00so i was a couple days off but my sources were goo...so i was a couple days off but my sources were good-ben k indicted today and roy "the buffer man" black slides, yet again.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-87928644323607015542008-02-07T10:26:00.000-05:002008-02-07T10:26:00.000-05:00I didn't publish the two signatures because I am o...I didn't publish the two signatures because I am old(er), barely computer literate, and it took forever for me to convert the letter from the handwriting expert into a jpeg so blogger would accept it. I didn't have another two hours to work on the signatures.Rumpolehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08380575650255695462noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-7266499463632469362008-02-07T10:19:00.000-05:002008-02-07T10:19:00.000-05:00I did not publish the Letterman top ten list- It c...I did not publish the Letterman top ten list- It called someone's wife fat, which is a no no. We don't attack people's spouses on this blog, and we don't attack people's appearances.Rumpolehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08380575650255695462noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-7064378663035722472008-02-07T09:40:00.001-05:002008-02-07T09:40:00.001-05:00Many courts have excluded Curtis Baggett's testimo...Many courts have excluded Curtis Baggett's testimony and concluded he is not an expert. His training in handwriting analysis is questionable at best. According to several courts, Mr. Baggett may not be a full-time forensic examiner and has held himself out as a psychologist and hypnotherapist. He is not certified or accredited by any handwriting analysis organization or association. And his methodology has been questioned by a number of courts.<BR/><BR/>In his affidavit he simply states the document is a forgery and "will prove this in Court." Not language one would normally expect to see in an expert report.<BR/><BR/>Finally, I gotta agree with The Captain's most recent comment......Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-40711398265651019552008-02-07T09:40:00.000-05:002008-02-07T09:40:00.000-05:00Jack, Jack, you're a wackpack up your bibleand don...Jack, Jack, you're a wack<BR/>pack up your bible<BR/>and don't come backAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-24610327295064068102008-02-07T08:40:00.000-05:002008-02-07T08:40:00.000-05:00On the remarkable point attempted to be made here ...On the remarkable point attempted to be made here by one or more individuals, including Rumpole indirectly (who has no idea what this means), please pay attention:<BR/><BR/>If you do away with the validity of any oath, even to the point as here that a person who is supposed to take an oath has someone else do it for her and then pretend she is the one who took the oath, then go ahead and do away with the concept of swearing witnesses and the notion that there is such a thing as perjury.<BR/><BR/>Are you people clear out of your minds? Take all that away and the entire justice system crumbles. You think Supreme Court Justices' ignoring the duty to take an oath of office is a good sign of "enligthenment?" You people who think so missed the last 500 years of jurisprudence in the West. Jack ThompsonAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-12404163988221777512008-02-07T08:13:00.000-05:002008-02-07T08:13:00.000-05:00jack reminds me of the little boy who cried wolf, ...jack reminds me of the little boy who cried wolf, and the captain touched on this. While he may have the occasional valid point, it all gets lost in his incessant whining. Am I really going to listen to, and consider the arguments of a guy that thinks all bar employees should be fired and all but one sup ct judge be removed? I doubt it. <BR/><BR/>In all honesty I think jack is an embarassment to the bar and himself. You've had your fifteen minutes, your career will be highlighted by some comical, yet looney demands that the world be fired, removed, disbarred, or what not. <BR/><BR/>You have lost all credibility and your 'show' is not funny anymore. if you dedicated your time to getting the escalators in the REG fixed you would finally get the respect you seem to yearn for.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-85190143886457792092008-02-07T06:54:00.000-05:002008-02-07T06:54:00.000-05:00John B. Thompson, Attorney at Law1172 S. Dixie Hwy...John B. Thompson, Attorney at Law<BR/>1172 S. Dixie Hwy., Suite 111<BR/>Coral Gables, Florida 33146<BR/>305-666-4366<BR/>amendmentone@comcast.net <BR/><BR/>February 7, 2008<BR/><BR/>Chief Judge Joseph Farina<BR/>Linda Kelly Kearson, General Counsel<BR/>Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida<BR/>Lawson E. Thomas Courthouse Center<BR/>175 NW First Avenue, 30th Floor<BR/>Miami, Florida 33128 Via Fax to 305-349-7168<BR/><BR/>Re: Judge Dava Tunis’ Forged Loyalty Oath by Notary Syed A. Shah<BR/><BR/>Dear Judge Farina and Ms. Kearson:<BR/><BR/>Please provide me, pursuant to Florida’s Public Records Law, the last known address of the above-noted Metro Justice Building employee, who is the one who falsely attested Tunis’ forged signature.<BR/><BR/>To do so is a felony.<BR/><BR/>Regards, Jack ThompsonAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-57466260225581974462008-02-07T06:35:00.000-05:002008-02-07T06:35:00.000-05:00Oh, and one more thing: The notary who certified ...Oh, and one more thing: The notary who certified that Tunis stood in front of her and signed the document, committed a third degree felony in doing so.<BR/><BR/>The position of some of you here would appear to be, then, that felony statutes are meaningless as well. Let's just tell notaries that they can sign documents themselves, attest their own signatures to be those of others, and just deed away all private property to whomever we want, okay?<BR/><BR/>You people are amazing. And I'm insane?<BR/><BR/>Jack ThompsonAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com