tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post6078447489954998981..comments2024-03-29T08:14:13.708-04:00Comments on THE BLOG: UH, MILT, WHAT WERE YOU THINKING???Rumpolehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08380575650255695462noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-82211270053914578522012-01-01T22:16:31.796-05:002012-01-01T22:16:31.796-05:00Remember, I am Chief Justice-Designate of the Supr...Remember, I am Chief Justice-Designate of the Supreme Court of the United States. I have been unanimously preconfirmed by the Senate and Soon-To-Be-Former Chief Justice Roberts has agreed to become an Associate Justice upon the next vacancy.<br /><br />How dare mere mortals such as yourselves question my superior wisdom, knowledge and intelligence.Mr. Chief Justice-Designate Milton Hirschnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-46950020454654253222011-12-31T18:30:36.876-05:002011-12-31T18:30:36.876-05:00It's true. The names of victims and civilian ...It's true. The names of victims and civilian witnesses are written on the backs of A-Forms. The court's copy (white copy) has it, as does the state's pink copy. Defense attorneys only get photocopies of the front in discovery.<br /><br />If the victim is listed as "V1" or "V" on the A-Form, then on the back, it will have the V1 or V designation followed by the name, address, even phone number. How do you think the state gets these people in for prefiles or even lists their addresses in discovery?<br /><br />There is no reason not to issue a stay away order in any case. Yes, it's a useless piece of paper and will not stop a bullet, but it serves no detriment to the defense to have a stay away order issued against a client in favor of a person whom they do not know. It makes the state happy and if god forbid the defendant goes after the alleged victim, the court can say that a stay away order was issued.<br /><br />It's such a trivial matter. Why a smart guy like Hirsch would make it a point not to issue one just shows me that maybe too much genius equals insanity.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-27270177933414236512011-12-31T16:24:11.143-05:002011-12-31T16:24:11.143-05:00Attn Kissass trialmaster:
Hirsh is off his mental...Attn Kissass trialmaster: <br />Hirsh is off his mental meds coctail lately! Snapping at everybody, saying the F work from the bench! I know he is an intelligent man & teaches law at two of our local univ.'s, but a year after he was "appointed", the chap is suffering from a major case of "judicial robitis".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-85361516955368723492011-12-31T16:08:26.153-05:002011-12-31T16:08:26.153-05:00And this one:
And by the way, defendant number th...And this one:<br /><br />And by the way, defendant number three in the rape case was arrested yesterday and guess what the Judge in Bond court did today......He issued the sao without being asked. Yes you are correct in your assumption. The Judge wasnt Judge Hirsh.<br /><br />Friday, December 30, 2011 11:56:00 PMCAPTAIN JUSTICEhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12179932096244679236noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-48432881704130007792011-12-31T16:08:00.124-05:002011-12-31T16:08:00.124-05:00Some more comments posted from yesterday:
The vic...Some more comments posted from yesterday:<br /><br />The victim's name is written on the back of the A-Form. Not issuing a stay away order because the defendant doesn't know the victim makes no sense. Stay away orders are issued in all cases involving a victim, violent or non-violent. <br /><br />Not issuing a stay away order because the defendant doesn't know the victim sounds like Hirsch trying to be innovative. It didn't work granting those 893 motions and it won't work by denying a stay away order to a rape victim.<br /><br />Don't reinvent the wheel. You're a bright guy but follow the law.<br /><br />Friday, December 30, 2011 12:51:00 PM<br /><br />AND<br /><br />If the guy doesn't know who the woman is, how will he know who to stay away from?<br />If he sees a woman at the store:<br />"Hi, how it goin' Wazz your name?"<br />"jane Doe"<br />"oh shizzz, you the chick i charged with rapin' I gots to stay away from you. I didnt know that wuz ur name."<br /><br />Friday, December 30, 2011 12:51:00 PM<br /><br />AND<br /><br />the Judge knew the name of the rape victim. if you listen to the tape, the prosecutor gave him a stay away order to sign with the victim's name on it. He refused and started asking those idiotic questions to the defendant. He has denied numerous sao's because he thinks that sao's are only for people that know each other. <br />Enough already......<br /><br />Friday, December 30, 2011 11:54:00 PMCAPTAIN JUSTICEhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12179932096244679236noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-48067445913324705952011-12-31T14:33:03.000-05:002011-12-31T14:33:03.000-05:00Mr. Justice Hirsch is one of, if not the best judg...Mr. Justice Hirsch is one of, if not the best judge in the REG. He is one of the few who could make more money in private practice than being on the bench. In fact, most of the judges we have could not make a living in private practice with a few exceptions like Stan,Emmas,Thorton,.Most of the judges have never tried cases.the trialmasternoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-55645588295727855252011-12-31T11:18:33.992-05:002011-12-31T11:18:33.992-05:00I'm a newbie - someone at whom Hirsch rolls hi...I'm a newbie - someone at whom Hirsch rolls his eyes and to whom he condescends - but even I get that this isnt about the SAO.<br /><br />It's about preserving all possible defenses or at least being well represented before being pressured into speaking in court.<br /><br />Hirsch is the smartest guy in Dade and doesn't get that?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-75965665532959077052011-12-31T09:26:26.977-05:002011-12-31T09:26:26.977-05:00So if the Defendant doesnt know the alleged victim...So if the Defendant doesnt know the alleged victim there is no reason for a stay away. I get it just rob or beat strangers.The Judge should have just issued the stay away and Never should have asked the questions he did.<br /> You can here the PD ( Elliot ?) at bond hearing objecting to the Questions. Hey why not have Judges ask All Defendants at Bond Hearings if they did the crime and get rid of trials, Due Process and the 4th, 5th n 6th Admendments?<br />DSDShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14580816823884896028noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-57077388913875133932011-12-30T22:08:24.981-05:002011-12-30T22:08:24.981-05:00bold ruling???? it was wicked retaaahdedbold ruling???? it was wicked retaaahdedAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com