tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post8709180646776897449..comments2024-03-29T07:50:52.621-04:00Comments on THE BLOG: IF YOU'RE SICK...GO TO JAIL.Rumpolehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08380575650255695462noreply@blogger.comBlogger33125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-64917780097952039122012-05-02T12:28:01.774-04:002012-05-02T12:28:01.774-04:00BDTD
If your arrested, your IN and doing time,fo...BDTD<br /> If your arrested, your IN and doing time,for 24-48 hours till bond-hearing or 21 days till arraignment.<br /> ONE HOUR is too much time for possession. <br /> I am offended by any and all Drug Arrests.<br />CTS means you did time for Drugs.<br /> And yes my guys w/ records do more, but the record is irrelevant since there is NO reason for a moment in lock-up for possession, period. IT Does NOT Matter how many priors nor what they are for. But most likely the priors are possession or lots of misdoes.<br />DS<br /><br />DSDSnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-67057708950774375422012-05-02T07:19:08.762-04:002012-05-02T07:19:08.762-04:00BTDT
Most clients go to rehab to avoid Jail, not ...BTDT<br /> Most clients go to rehab to avoid Jail, not cause they are forced into treatment.<br /> That fact that rehabs biggest bus comes from the Courts supports my arguement, I beleive , not yours.<br />DSDSnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-67708411112775635622012-05-01T22:50:25.331-04:002012-05-01T22:50:25.331-04:0010:00 I did not originate the "Cat fish &...10:00 I did not originate the "Cat fish & Grits subject, Willard the Rich Robot did. I have eaten the two before , however I prefer Hog Snapper or Yellow tail. What would make you think that I would cow tow my name isn't "Clarence." I'm from the "New Generation," I was just being facetious.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-13315040297854822442012-05-01T20:28:44.497-04:002012-05-01T20:28:44.497-04:006:00 pm..........even a broken clock is right twic...6:00 pm..........even a broken clock is right twice a day ;-)<br /><br />BTDTAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-65089010158176230062012-05-01T20:23:00.343-04:002012-05-01T20:23:00.343-04:00They just decriminalized, inter alia, commercial ...They just decriminalized, inter alia, commercial vehicles without signs, doing business without a license and drinking alcohol with 100 feet of convenience stores. If they decriminalize drugs, we might as well do civil litigation downtown.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-48980063608073499182012-05-01T18:00:38.949-04:002012-05-01T18:00:38.949-04:00BTDT-
I rarely agree with your comments, but I th...BTDT-<br /><br />I rarely agree with your comments, but I think you are correct with this one. Decriminalization I believe would lead to a disaster.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-5183086377774868602012-05-01T11:40:28.488-04:002012-05-01T11:40:28.488-04:00DS-----You say the current system is not working, ...DS-----You say the current system is not working, but the alternative you suggest is far worse. Did you know that the single biggest referral source for treatment providers is the justice system? The VAST majority of those who need treatment don't seek it until they're forced to do so. Legalize drugs and watch the number of addicts and homeless people and the cost of healthcare skyrocket.<br /><br />The reality is that the system is working, just not working nearly as well as it should be. People shouldn't be going to jail or prison for simple possession (I don't recall what court you're in, but you seem to be the only one with clients going to jail for possession without lengthy rap sheets). The justice system DOES need to change. The answer is better use of drug courts (and mental health courts, veterans courts, etc.) and treatment/monitoring alternatives.<br /><br />BTDT<br /><br />PS---read the research on California's experiment with diversionary programs/decriminalization. It's been a horrible failure. Even many of the original proponents recognize that now.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-29377138512905866372012-04-30T23:02:28.490-04:002012-04-30T23:02:28.490-04:00What "vice" type crime has been eradicat...What "vice" type crime has been eradicated through criminal punishment?<br /><br />Gambling?<br />Prostitution? <br />Alcohol?<br /><br />Any reason to think narcotics will be the first?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-12017119225274035962012-04-30T22:58:04.346-04:002012-04-30T22:58:04.346-04:00PS
The War on Drugs is FORTY ( 40 ) Years Old. I h...PS<br />The War on Drugs is FORTY ( 40 ) Years Old. I have been practicing a quarter century. I have not seen a change in the flow of arrests for drug possession at the Justice Building.<br /> To continue a policy that does not work, is repressive , wastes resources and tax dollars is Bad Policy, if not stupid.<br /><br /> Legalize it.<br />DSDSnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-45794618662505297662012-04-30T22:55:53.121-04:002012-04-30T22:55:53.121-04:00BTDT
Not every user, hellt most DO NOT become add...BTDT<br /> Not every user, hellt most DO NOT become addicts. Its the brain re-acation the causes addiction. <br /><br />Most can intox without addiction.<br />Just DONT DRIVE BUZZED or HIGH!!<br /><br /> I as a Free American swhould be able to chose my intoxicant.<br /><br />PROHIBITION CAUSE DRUG CRIME.<br /><br />It makes NO sense to lock up drug users or buyers or even small time sellers. <br /><br />And yess BTDT, come to araignments in the Felony divisions and see guys get time for buying or possessing.<br /><br /> At least make it a ticlet w/ $500 fine . <br />A guy in 21 days who gets CTS at arraignment cost us taxpayers more than $2100 with lock up ,court setting costs for bondhearing and arraignment plus cops time..<br /><br />Stop creating arrest stats for personal use or purchase.<br /><br />DSDSnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-85251153943013454332012-04-30T22:20:38.810-04:002012-04-30T22:20:38.810-04:00Am Min
You are such an idiot, it's scary.
C...Am Min<br /><br />You are such an idiot, it's scary. <br /><br />Catfish and grits? Do you also think every black person has a straw hat and overalls, and always responds with "sho 'nuff" and "yes massa?"<br /> <br />Not every black person spends the summer at the fishing' hole trying to scare up some eats.<br /><br />If you are black, you really do a disservice to everyone who went before you to break those stereotypes. <br /><br />Please stop.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-85072144443873814222012-04-30T22:14:28.011-04:002012-04-30T22:14:28.011-04:00Legalization is not the answer.
You know you ju...Legalization is not the answer. <br /><br />You know you just can't leave it up to the people to decide for themselves. <br /><br />I can just hear them now. "It's legal, I can do what I want."<br /><br />I believe in personal freedom. This ain't one of those areas.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-88599748202464273902012-04-30T21:25:18.681-04:002012-04-30T21:25:18.681-04:00DS.....can you explain to me again why you want to...DS.....can you explain to me again why you want to legalize drugs like cocaine when you know that chronic use leads to cognitive decline? <br /><br />I don't get how the articles you cite on cognitive decline support your position on legalization (which surely would lead to increased usage). Especially since, as addictive and dangerous as it is, cocaine is not as addictive or dangerous as many other drugs.<br /><br />BTDTAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-3248534501455913232012-04-30T21:19:26.355-04:002012-04-30T21:19:26.355-04:00Ex-blackjack dealer.....Miami-Dade prosecutors and...Ex-blackjack dealer.....Miami-Dade prosecutors and judges aren't putting people in jail for smoking weed. Hell, they aren't even putting people in jail for simple possession of ANY controlled substances unless the person has a rap sheet the length of my arm. You sure you're posting on the right blog? <br /><br />BTDTAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-55911870306703707022012-04-30T20:24:42.509-04:002012-04-30T20:24:42.509-04:00Here's the link to the Brain chemistry / physi...Here's the link to the Brain chemistry / physical changes w/ drugs article. The Orginal Article is from Scientific American, but the` link isto HuffingtonPost<br />DS<br /><br />Cocaine Brain? Cognitive Decline Tied To Chronic Use Of Illicit Drug <br /><br />http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/24/cocaine-brain-age_n_1449156.html?ref=science&icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl11%7Csec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D154803<br /><br />see also<br />http://www.scientificamerican.com/DSnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-72113868731924493792012-04-30T20:22:18.232-04:002012-04-30T20:22:18.232-04:00Jesus Christ, some of you people are just so pathe...Jesus Christ, some of you people are just so pathetic. To the person who left the post at 4:34, you can't even spell homey correctly. It's not homie, you white honky moron, it's HOMEY. Now go back to practicing your lame ass dance moves to Vanilla Ice. No wonder the public has such a dim view of lawyers.Secret Judgenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-37665153314723236922012-04-30T19:43:14.949-04:002012-04-30T19:43:14.949-04:00All this talk about elections and race-
Forget i...All this talk about elections and race- <br /><br />Forget it. It is what it always has been. <br /><br />If you want to make a real difference, do what you can do to make sure Seskin is not elected. Everyone will be better off if she never gets on the bench.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-23629298876823941672012-04-30T19:14:13.764-04:002012-04-30T19:14:13.764-04:00Question, do we really want a guy who has never ea...Question, do we really want a guy who has never eaten good Ol American Catfish & Grits, and straps their poor pooch to the roof of a car on a family trip, and seems to be a complete dweeb/dufus, to be the POTUS.Hell, even Jack Henderson put the dog in the car....IJS Lmao! <br /><br />This guy Willard is a Robot, imagine his inauguration speech: "Hello-my-friends-corporations-are-people."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-32510172018707586282012-04-30T19:03:51.294-04:002012-04-30T19:03:51.294-04:00I have never heard of TAV , SAV, or TFATS. Not apa...I have never heard of TAV , SAV, or TFATS. Not apart of this SAO training or policies. Sounds like Rod is starting in on rumor spreading.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-39510646284782844452012-04-30T17:28:10.471-04:002012-04-30T17:28:10.471-04:00For approximately the last 15 years I have asked j...For approximately the last 15 years I have asked judges and prosecutors why they want to put a person in a cage for smoking weed? I have never received a valid or worthwhile response. <br /><br />Our State is broke, our Counties and cities are broke, we cant find $$$ to pay teachers, cops, court personel ect.. but yet we can still find money to put a weed in a cage. Go Figure !Ex Blackjack Dealernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-15360196599913039222012-04-30T16:53:32.293-04:002012-04-30T16:53:32.293-04:00BIG-DUH!BIG-DUH!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-34734443587173128422012-04-30T16:34:54.053-04:002012-04-30T16:34:54.053-04:00Rump- very big "Artie Party" coming up. ...Rump- very big "Artie Party" coming up. Much in the spirit of the "Miami Loves Migna" campaign that swept the judge into office a few years ago. <br /><br />The Artie party will feature some big names- possibly including a Bob Marley Off-spring who will introduce the "artie be jamming 4 justice" campaign song. <br /><br />Word up homie.artie party infonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-7970272333726840812012-04-30T16:10:37.962-04:002012-04-30T16:10:37.962-04:00The difference between a diabetic and a drug user ...The difference between a diabetic and a drug user is that drug use has certain negative externalities associated with their purchase and consumption of drugs. (i.e., walk through certain inner city neighborhoods and its obvious what I'm talking about). <br /><br />The more ambitious question is why aren't we legalizing certain narcotics? I think legalizing certain narcotics would address some of the negative externalities in terms of the violence and public health issues associated with (presently) illegal narcotics.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-52509498286577338332012-04-30T15:45:31.724-04:002012-04-30T15:45:31.724-04:00The audacity of some people running for a seat on ...The audacity of some people running for a seat on the bench astonishes me. Here is the first in my critique of the races I believe to be the most dangerous election races:<br /><br />Seskin v. Cuesta -<br /><br />Cuesta should get your vote.<br /><br />Cuesta, whether you like her or not, is a trial lawyer. She has spent a career in public service with numerous actual jury trials under her belt. She has handled, as both first and second chair, serious felony matters. She currently is the head of domestic representation and therefore additionally has years of supervisory experience as well as her trial experience.<br /><br />Seskin's own Bio should explain to you why she is not qulaified to waer the robe. She worked for the PDO for less than 2 years. Her bio leaves off the reason for her leaving the ofice but I woud invite our media to do some digging. It was not simply because she wanted to spend more time with her children as her bio claims. She ultimately ended up at the SAO where she has spent her tenure in the screening unit. I would not insult anyone in any particular position in either office but let's face it, Ms. Seskin is not in court and she is not trying cases of any magnitude. <br /><br />Ms. Seskin's lack of actual trial and legal experience is appalling for someone who wants to preside over cases. As one can tell, I do not support her candidacy and that is partly because I know her personally. Her demeanor is atrocious. She is not kind, understanding or patient. Her demeanor in that capacity, if elected to judge, would simply become enhanced.<br /><br />Even if you believe my support of Ms. Cuesta to be due to personal animosity, I would ask your readers, the members of the media, and the public to simply compare their credentials in legal areas alone. Ms. Cuesta is clearly the more qualified candidate.Disenchanted and concernednoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19039943.post-56530122304901157222012-04-30T14:40:36.410-04:002012-04-30T14:40:36.410-04:00DS...the first use is a choice, plain and simple. ...DS...the first use is a choice, plain and simple. Once started, it becomes hard for many people to stop. Still, free will plays a big role no matter how you slice it (which is why addiction is different from most other medical ailments). Still, I agree with the overall point that addiction has a signfiicant genetic component. <br /><br />Of course, I'd argue that the addictive quality of the drugs you want to legalize and the dangerousness of many of them (you say all of them) is precisely why they should remain illegal. <br /><br />BTDTAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com